🚀 go-pugleaf

"Tom P." <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message 
news:FXr2g.851$c%2.442@newsfe21.lga...
> pcourterelle wrote:
>> "Aeroplan" <aplan967@shaw.ca> wrote in message 
>> news:yXi2g.59054$WI1.23964@pd7tw2no...
>>
>>><rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message 
>>>news:1145662759.618290.312670@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>..........................for protecting the heroin source that will be
>>>>coming into Canada for the Hell's Angels to sell to your kids.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks a fuckin' bunch Harpo and Hitlier!
>>>
>>>I wouldn't blame the soliders, but they sure have an inept PM at the helm 
>>>right now.  Way to turn our boys into opium and oil pipe line 'human 
>>>shields'.
>>>
>>>'Terrorists threat' is to today, what 'synergy' was to the 90's
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Ilitis Jeeps
>> Sea King Helicopters
>> Hercules Transports
>>
>> What kind of government sends it troops into harms way knowing it is 
>> unprotected and at serious risk from its own outdated, out-classed 
>> equipment.
>>
>> A callous one.
>> A Liberal one.
>>
>> pc
> What kind of government keeps them there, changes their mission to a 
> fighting force from a peacekeeping one, and even extends their mission?
>
> A U.S. lapdog.
> A Conservative one.

The Kandahar mission was never just about peace keeping and it's foolish to 
think so. It's very much about peace making and stability enhancement. It's 
about the active engagement of Afghanis and Taliban. The Conservatives did 
not 'change the mission' nor extend the length of stay, which runs until 
early 2007.

Was Paul Martin a US lapdog when he agreed to the mission in the first 
place?

At least get the facts straight.

pc