🚀 go-pugleaf

keith lim wrote...

> Quite so. Assumptions on my part. Best guesses.
> 
> So if I was wildly wrong, please, correct me and satisfy my curiosity.
> What was the reason for citing, unprompted, your mention in the
> net.legends faq? What was the thinking behind your offer to nominate
> Eric for entry in an updated faq?

I think there are two reasons for this.  First, he is unable to deal with 
the factual matter included in my posts rationally.  Second, I assume 
that he may have noted that I nominated him as KOTM (kook of the month) 
on alt.usenet.kooks last year, due to some of his more bizarre ravings.

These included a post in which he indicated his fear that loggers were 
going to come and invade his home because of his posts; a post in which 
he described forestry workers as a subset that produces more children 
than normal so they can collect more welfare; and a post in which he 
inexplicably began discussing his daughter's homework, completely off-
topic.

I think that I may try to nominate him again this year as the first 
person in usenet history who, when replying to a post, snips the content 
of the post, and then cuts and pastes the message header of the previous 
poster, and then having done that, rattles on about neither the header 
nor the deleted content. Unfortunately a.u.k. is going downhill fast and 
nobody notices these things anymore.

E.Schild
haffabee@usa.net