Article View: bc.general
Article #880Re: More Suzuki Anti-Science
From: Kelly Bert Manning
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:12
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:12
43 lines
3389 bytes
3389 bytes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Alan Baker wrote: > > Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha > ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha > ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! > > You know, if you're going to make a statement like that, you might want > to at least pick an example that _supports_ it. I just did. The 2 persons who came out at the top of the computer industry fortune heap inherited millions before they ever got out of high school. Gates likes to claim that he didn't use family money, but Bill Gates II set him up with his buddies for the financing and his mother just happened to be on the national board of united way with the IBMer who had signing authority for DOS. Small contry, isn't it. > > Whatever wealth Bill Gates (III) may have from his family pales in > comparison to the money he has made from his own efforts. Whatever I may > think of how original his ideas were, I recognize that the success he > has enjoyed is the fruits of his labours and not a result of his > family's wealth -- pittance that it is. From "Hard Drive" a description of a typical Bill Gates III negoting session with a software writer goes something like hm, I can tell you're a pretty smart guy, it can't have taken you long to write this, did it, so a reasonable return on your time is x hours tims y per hour plus I'll throw in a bonus of So much for Mr. Bill's hardwork. Remember how M$ just decided to ignore copyright and use disk compression software belonging to somebody else, hoping they would run out of money for lawyers before M$ did? > > The entire micro-computer industry is a picture-perfect example of > people with good ideas who were willing to work hard making good on > their own merits. Unless M$ decides they want it for themselves? Or that they are going to bundle an M$ version of whatever product you write as an integrated part of Windoz? Without M$ we would have a lot more choice, a lot more companies competing in the marketplace and much better software.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010612220142.13611B-100000@vtn1>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!news.victoria.tc.ca!vtn1!ua602References:
<01c0ecb2$abfa1100$283332cc@default> <MPG.158b86078e048bf6989bd4@news.uniserve.com> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010609140820.8049H-100000@vtn1> <3b26a362.28267947@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010612173709.2005B-100000@vtn1> <Alan_Baker-B34BB3.18571812062001@clgrps11.telusplanet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb626,2c021e1f9457cbda X-Google-Attributes: gidfb626,public X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,2c021e1f9457cbda X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-12 22:12:39 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!news.victoria.tc.ca!vtn1!ua602 From: Kelly Bert Manning <ua602@victoria.tc.ca> Newsgroups: bc.general,ab.politics Subject: Re: More Suzuki Anti-Science Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:12:33 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010612220142.13611B-100000@vtn1> Sender: ua602@vtn1 In-Reply-To: <Alan_Baker-B34BB3.18571812062001@clgrps11.telusplanet.net> References: <01c0ecb2$abfa1100$283332cc@default> <MPG.158b86078e048bf6989bd4@news.uniserve.com> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010609140820.8049H-100000@vtn1> <3b26a362.28267947@news1.gvcl1.bc.home.com> <Pine.GSO.3.95.iB1.0.1010612173709.2005B-100000@vtn1> <Alan_Baker-B34BB3.18571812062001@clgrps11.telusplanet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.60.222.3 XPident: ua602 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 44