🚀 go-pugleaf

Brian Hampson <brian@asl-labs.bc.ca> wrote:
>: 	I don't understand why knowing the names of a lot of machines
>: makes for any more usefulness than knowing just one or two. 
>
>Each host has potential weaknesses depending on OS etc, and if the attack 
>is spread out, it is less likely to be noticed than if it were 
>concentrated on one system

	Question: is it the same amount of difficulty to find IP 
addresses in a foreign domain as it is to find their machine names?  
Because if it's easier to get the numbers, I really don't see why you 
need to get the names at all for an attack.

>: --
>: : That's because you've never used Pico, the editor that lets you think of
>: : something else.
>: Yes, such as:
>:   ``Soon as I get out of this thing, I'm going back to cat''
>
>Not sure who this was attributed to, I believe it was part of your sig?

	Yeah, I pulled it off Usenet somewhere.
--
"Ed is the standard text editor."
When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their
"edlin" on a UNIX standard, did they mimic vi?  No.  Emacs?  Surely
you jest.  They chose the most karmic editor of all.  The standard.