Article View: be.comp.games
Article #35Re: Review site with Minimum AND Recommended System spec.
From: Dmitry Korolyov [MVP]
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:07
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:07
49 lines
3342 bytes
3342 bytes
My personal experience for AOE 3: running it on Athlon64 3200+ Venice, 1 GB dual-channel PC2700 RAM with PCI-E 256 Mb GeForce 6800 video card, at 1280x1024 resolution with all possible quality options set to maximum. The game is definitely playable, however, a bit sluggish perfomance may be noticed for a very short times when there are large armies on the screen. So basically its ok, its maximum available perfomance, just not always. I would suggest GeForce 6800 GT or better video card (instead of just 6800) for that game if you want to achieve even more comfortable playtime. Sorry, can't advise about ATI cards (because I personally don't like them). Talking about CPU and RAM, I don't think you would buy something worse that A64-3200+ CPU (which is about equal to latest pentiums running at 4+ Ghz) and less that 1 Gb of RAM. Also, I would recommend against any worse videocard if you really want to enjoy the game. For rise of rome, I don't know anything except that its system requirements are much much lower. P.S. Personally, I don't like AOE3. Mostly because the game has lost the good old AOE flavour, that's one reason. Another is because it is heavily underbalanced and still has NO RANDOM MAPS - even now when 4 patches have been released. Basically, you will end up playing the same and same rush games on the same 20 maps that the game has...and hope that another one map will be added with the new patch. Ensemble Studios (the developers) do not seem to be actually listening to what people say on the forums, and just delete the posts asking "why the game is missing many features that are de-facto must have for any strategy game today?" -- Dmitry Korolyov [d__k@removethispart.mail.ru] MVP: Windows Server - Directory Services "m." <none@example.net> wrote in message news:JoLzf.165333$EP6.6525980@phobos.telenet-ops.be... > But that's always the point: the sw producer only mentions the minimum. > I would like to know the recommended system specification. > So, I'm looking for a review site for that. > > thanks anyway, > M. > > Jimmy S. schreef: >> Hi m., >> >> For AOE III the specific system requirements are listed in this article: >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/907884 >>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<#xjBDTgIGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!msrtrans!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gblReferences:
<p1azf.120955$XY4.6418568@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <#11Hm64GGHA.3828@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl> <JoLzf.165333$EP6.6525980@phobos.telenet-ops.be>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10fb4c,913cd98f116ec123 X-Google-Thread: 113538,913cd98f116ec123 X-Google-Thread: 10e1a5,913cd98f116ec123 X-Google-Attributes: gid10fb4c,gid113538,gid10e1a5,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit From: "Dmitry Korolyov [MVP]" <d__k@removethispart.mail.ru> References: <p1azf.120955$XY4.6418568@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <#11Hm64GGHA.3828@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl> <JoLzf.165333$EP6.6525980@phobos.telenet-ops.be> Subject: Re: Review site with Minimum AND Recommended System spec. Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:07:55 +0300 Lines: 51 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Message-ID: <#xjBDTgIGHA.2696@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl> Newsgroups: be.comp.games,nl.comp.games,microsoft.public.games NNTP-Posting-Host: clusterfw.beelinegprs.com 217.118.66.232 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!msrtrans!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl