🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <32F72327.446B@luc.ac.be>, Herbert Baerten <hbaerten@luc.ac.be>
wrote:

> Marc Roger wrote:
>  
> > This mail must be understood as an early objection to the irregular
> > procedure of Mr. Ivo De Broeck.
> 
> I must agree with Mr. Roger on all points. I have asked the votetaker to
> change my vote from YES to NO to reflect my opinion, although I don't
> know if a change of vote is allowed (it is not clear from the CFV).

I too agree, have voted NO, and, by the way, urge everyone to vote NO
- whenever there are irregularities;
- or whenever the proposer and the vote-taker of a group are the same person;
- or whenever the intermediate results are posted with a break-down in Yes
and No-votes (the horror!) as e.g. in news:mt2.0-993-854657771@jafshome;
- or whenever a new group proposal amounts to creating a subgroup of a
group that is still very small itself;
all this regardless of the possible intrinsic merit of the proposed group
or change.
--
Dr. Denis Constales - dcons@world.std.com - http://cage.rug.ac.be/~dc/