Article View: be.comp.internet
Article #58522Re: Re- Bad HTML / frame usage
From: Philippe Duchenne
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 00:00
148 lines
7392 bytes
7392 bytes
Hello there Thomas Weigle !
On 22-Jan-97 01:04:06, you wrote about Re: Re- Bad HTML / frame usage :
> In article <5c1s1h$5do@cc.tut.fi>, p116711@cc.tut.fi (Tero Paananen) wrote:
>> In <weigle-ya023180002001972352440001@news.algonet.se>
> weigle@snip-to-mail.algonet.se (Thomas Weigle) writes:
>>
>> The multitude of excuses for bad web design never ceases to amaze me,
>> it's like a flooding river of drivel that never stops.
> I agree. One of the worst excuses? "It is a standard!" spoken by people who
Standard: Whole characteristics and norms to which one can refer for
products or values of the same nature.
If you don't like the word "standard", I would say "It's the most
acceptable (reliable) *free-for-all* guidelines in an attemp to
satisfy everyone's needs and to make new technologies as accessible
as possible to most of them, if not all.".
Does this seems a good "excuse" to you ?
> are in a clear minority. Standards are not set by minorities. That's what
> we usually refer to as oppression if we don't like 'em.
Minorities are always complaining...
Minorities are disturbing our comfort...
I *your* wish is to ignore, silence, or get rid of minorities;
*my* wish is to get rid of marginalisation. (Is this correct english ?)
>> Oh? Every site needs Java and Shockwave and a few QuickTime sound files?
> Not every site. I said that. A site entirely based on information that
> users will be willing to read although it's badly formatted and designed
> will not suffer from a static design, but any site that is trying to *get*
> *new* customers on the Web will suffer if their user base happens to be
> among the people with new Netscape and Internet Explorer browsers, people
> who don't even know what HTML is. And this is not an uncommon thing.
"COME IN MY WONDERLAND ! EVERYTHING IS EASY, FUNNY, COOL ! THERE'S
SUN, THERE'S HAPPINESS, THERE'S...
What ? You don't even have one dollar ???
Er... This wonderland is not for you, you need dollars to enter here.
Come back later and be welcome if you have some."
>
>> And once again, the multimedia humbug red-herring "grey background text
>> only" as an only alternative for your "lookie-here-mom,
>> Java-without-hands".
> It was an example. If we happen to go back to white pages and black text,
> set as if it were a pocket book, that's what I would design pages like. But
> it won't happen so I won't have to bother about that.
"What ? There are still people reading black text on white background ?
in our century ??? (warf, warf)
Oh yes, THOSE people...
They are very few... it's not important."
>> What the **** are you talking about? Explain what relevance one or even
>> two browsers have on a _World Wide_ Web?
> Yes. *World Wide* Web. And of this *world*, 70-95% of all users are
> experienced to one of these two browsers. These browsers are more the WWW
> than are any consortium to most people.
"Blind people ? No, they are not human !"
> As for the W3C's role, take a look at some of the member companies. Adobe
> has Pagemill, which generates terrible HTML; Apple are proud of the BMW USA
^^^^^^^^
Use something else
> site, which is not exactly friendly to old browsers; Ericsson are working
Why not kindly tell them this ?
(have a look at http://www.axismundi.org/Cf/spiraea/amigaphil/report.html)
> with Icon Media Lab (which naturally makes them enemies of the WWW,
> right?); IBM are working with Razorfish, who never fear using the latest
> stuff; Microsoft has Internet Explorer; Netscape has Navigator and
> Communicator; NeXT are a part of Apple; Siemens-Nixdorf are working with
> Icon Media Lab; Sony are working with Studio Verso and David Siegel, as
> well as with Razorfish; Sun allowed Netscape to call it JavaScript and
> would love a more interactive Web.
> That's just a few that I can come up with offhand. You have misconceptions
> about the importance of *your* World Wide Web.
^^^^^^
AAAArrrgghh !!! (the forbidden word ;-) )
*O U R* World Wide Web ! WWW is a common place for EVERYONE !
It's up to *us* to share it in peace and tolerance.
>> Might not be lynx, but it sure as hell might be a text browser used by
>> the Chinese...you know, the country with 1/4th of the population in the
>> world. Yes, development countries are BOUND to hit the web some day and
>> believe me, they will NOT have multimedia terminals at their homes. If
>> your site ignores them (provided it is of interest to a world wide
>> audience), you will lose and you will lose BIG!
> Might be. Yup. Because all those 600 million oppressed farmers really will
> be able to pick up a computer. Get real. China already have Internet
> access. Some of them. This Internet access is not fully free, y'know. For
> example, USA Today, CNN, and similar sites are censored.
sic
>> The day software run on MS-Windows will run my house is the day I will
>> relocate myself to a place with no electricity, no computers and no
>> MS-Windows.
> So? Now you sound like you really will make a difference. People say that
> about Microsoft every day, and refuse to use any MS product. Has it really
> made a difference?
Not that much as long as there are still a lot of people thinking
Microsoft is THE way to go just because so many people already follow it.
> //thomas
> --
>: Web Designer at Icon Media Lab and generally a nice guy too. :
>: Work: thomas@iconmedialab.se -- <http://www.iconmedialab.se/> :
>: Home: weigle@algonet.se -- <http://www.algonet.se/~weigle/> :
>: Opinions expressed are mine and not those of my employer. :
> .................................................................
Phil.
--
Amiga ____ ------------------------------------------------.
Phil / / / ------ Philippe Duchenne | #PGP.key:#
____ / / / E-Mail: AmigaPhil@ping.be | #9C07F6C1#
\ \ \/ / / WWWeb : http://www.ping.be/amigaphil/ `----------|
\ \/ / / S-Mail: PO Box 4222, B-6000 Charleroi 4, Belgium |
\/_/_/ ------ using AMIGA 4000/040@40Mhz, 34Mb Ram, CV64 |
------------------------------------------------------'
PGP fp: 7C 40 02 C3 8D 90 81 30 81 28 67 FA FB DE A7 EC
--
IfYouCanReadThisYourSpecksAreBetterThanMine
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6381.6963T1354T1786@ping.be>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5bvhel$emc$5@euas20.eua.ericsson.se> <weigle-ya023180002001972352440001@news.algonet.se> <5c1s1h$5do@cc.tut.fi> <weigle-ya023180002201970104060001@news.algonet.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fefc7,51d22fd499362dbc X-Google-Attributes: gidfefc7,public X-Google-Thread: fe74c,51d22fd499362dbc X-Google-Attributes: gidfe74c,public X-Google-Thread: f4ad3,51d22fd499362dbc X-Google-Attributes: gidf4ad3,public X-Google-Thread: 128453,51d22fd499362dbc X-Google-Attributes: gid128453,public From: Philippe Duchenne <Philippe.Duchenne@ping.be> Subject: Re: Re- Bad HTML / frame usage Date: 1997/01/24 Message-ID: <6381.6963T1354T1786@ping.be> X-Deja-AN: 212045506 references: <5bvhel$emc$5@euas20.eua.ericsson.se> <weigle-ya023180002001972352440001@news.algonet.se> <5c1s1h$5do@cc.tut.fi> <weigle-ya023180002201970104060001@news.algonet.se> organization: EUnet Belgium, Leuven, Belgium newsgroups: be.comp.internet,ping.html,comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html,comp.infosystems.www.misc