Article View: be.comp.os.unix
Article #22Re: networking/NAT problem
From: stef-spam
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:37
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:37
19 lines
1926 bytes
1926 bytes
In be.comp.os.unix Jan Atle Ramsli <trolle_damn_spam_t@spam_is_evil_skynet.be> wrote: > In article <9sf3tt$e14$1@remlap.iguana.be>, "stef-spam" > <stef-spam@iguana.be> wrote: >> In be.comp.os.unix Jan Atle Ramsli >> <trolle_damn_spam_t@spam_is_evil_skynet.be> wrote: >>> Masquerading takes a few bytes off the MTU value ... >> >> No, it doesn't! > Then I must have made an invalid assumption. > Are the adresses replaced, not embedded within the datagrames? The fact that the IP addresses are replaced doesn't influence the MTU. ADSL w/ pppoe has a lower MTU (1492), you might be mixing up these two things. (especially if you have installed a *n*x box as a router) stef
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9si0bu$qtm$2@remlap.iguana.be>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!opentransit.net!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!sboj.iguana.be!remlap.iguana.be!not-for-mailReferences:
<3BE06D90.EF7787D9@bsdaemon.be> <GubE7.3737$G43.391@afrodite.telenet-ops.be> <PxbE7.3754$G43.358@afrodite.telenet-ops.be> <3beaf349$0$21072$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <9sf3tt$e14$1@remlap.iguana.be> <3bec0c23$0$36460$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109d4a,6d47cb22e59fb337 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d4a,public X-Google-Thread: 100a19,6d47cb22e59fb337 X-Google-Attributes: gid100a19,public X-Google-Thread: 105af6,6d47cb22e59fb337 X-Google-Attributes: gid105af6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-09 18:01:23 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!opentransit.net!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!sboj.iguana.be!remlap.iguana.be!not-for-mail From: stef-spam@iguana.be Newsgroups: be.comp.os.unix,be.comp.os.linux,be.comp.networking Subject: Re: networking/NAT problem Date: 10 Nov 2001 01:37:02 GMT Organization: subbacultcha Lines: 19 Message-ID: <9si0bu$qtm$2@remlap.iguana.be> References: <3BE06D90.EF7787D9@bsdaemon.be> <GubE7.3737$G43.391@afrodite.telenet-ops.be> <PxbE7.3754$G43.358@afrodite.telenet-ops.be> <3beaf349$0$21072$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> <9sf3tt$e14$1@remlap.iguana.be> <3bec0c23$0$36460$ba620e4c@news.skynet.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: remlap-eth0.np.int X-Trace: remlap.iguana.be 1005356222 27574 192.168.10.1 (10 Nov 2001 01:37:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@remlap.iguana.be NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Nov 2001 01:37:02 GMT