🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Xns9415BB6C780F1JanC@213.118.75.228>,
 JanC <usenet_spam@janc.invalid> wrote:

> Uit Bruce Schneier's CRYPTO-GRAM voor Oktober:
> """
> China is getting a copy of the Windows source code.  I've already written 
> about the security risks of open-source versus proprietary software.  One 
> of the problems with open source is that the bad guys get to look at the 
> code.  One of the good things about open source is that the good guys get 
> to look at the code, too.  If I were the Chinese government, I'd turn that 
> code upside down looking for vulnerabilities, and then not tell anyone 
> about them.  This seems like a huge security risk to me, even though 
> Microsoft might consider it a smart business move.
> <http://news.com.com/2102-1016_3-5083458.html>
> """
> 
> Iets om over na te denken...?




Als je weet dat de laatste software voor de nieuwe "NSA TCP/IP politie" 
in de volksrepubliek geschreven wordt...

't is nl. veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeel goedkoper dan 'm in de US te laten 
schrijven.

Ik wist al lang dat de US government geen brains had, maar dit slaat 
toch wel alles. Alhoewel, de Diebold affaire wil de pers zelfs niet 
oppikken. 't heeft Wired drie maanden gekost en de rest zwijgt nog 
steeds als vermoord.

-- 
"1024 microphones = 1 megaphone"