Thread View: be.rec.photography
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by darkman
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:52
Resolution
Author: darkman
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:52
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:52
13 lines
1812 bytes
1812 bytes
Might be a dumb question, but here goes - I've had an old Nikon D50 'starter' DSLR for years, and have progressed up the chain to a D200, D300 and now a full-frame D700, all with Nikon's excellent glass. Trouble is, despite all the hoopla the old D50 seems to have better apparent sharpness before Photoshop tweaking - consistently better images. The D300 and D700 (12+ MP) all need aggressive sharpening, even when they were shot at higher shutter speeds or mounted on tripods, while the old 6MP D50's files just look crisp right up front. I shoot in RAW exclusively, so compression isn't an issue. Is there some inherent difference in the way the sensors process information? I've seen needle-sharp results from D300s in magazines, but despite it all I can't get the same results - except with my old 'plastic' D50 and its dinky kit 18-135mm AF lens. What's wrong here?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads