🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: be.rec.photography
1 messages
1 total messages Started by darkman Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:52
Resolution
#47
Author: darkman
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:52
13 lines
1812 bytes
Might be a dumb question, but here goes - I've had an old Nikon D50 
'starter' DSLR for years, and have progressed up the chain to a D200, 
D300 and now a full-frame D700, all with Nikon's excellent glass. 
Trouble is, despite all the hoopla the old D50 seems to have better 
apparent sharpness before Photoshop tweaking - consistently better 
images. The D300 and D700 (12+ MP) all need aggressive sharpening, even 
when they were shot at higher shutter speeds or mounted on tripods, 
while the old 6MP D50's files just look crisp right up front. I shoot in 
RAW exclusively, so compression isn't an issue.  Is there some inherent 
difference in the way the sensors process information? I've seen 
needle-sharp results from D300s in magazines, but despite it all I can't 
get the same results - except with my old 'plastic' D50 and its dinky 
kit 18-135mm AF lens. What's wrong here?
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads