Article View: best.general
Article #1567Re: Caller ID and NOSPAM
From: Todd Michel McComb
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
16 lines
1387 bytes
1387 bytes
In article <see-below-2807980057080001@dynamic22.pm01.mv.best.com>, Matthew Vaughan <see-below@not-my-address.com> wrote: >the same people that opposed the Communications Decency Act >... You have a funny way In both cases, we are in favor of more open & easy communication. It is a very similar thing. Forging an address isn't communicating... it's putting up a block to communication. Rationalizations aside, the fundamental act is crystal clear. >I'm not saying munging is the best or only way to do things, just >that it does exactly what I want it to Right, it's selfish anti-social behavior, and that's the only argument you have to fall back on. Even a little bit, multiplied over thousands of people, adds up to a lot.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6pktga$1t9$1@machaut.medieval.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <see-below-2407982140000001@dynamic57.pm05.mv.best.com> <rone.MonJul27151110PDT1998.10139@ennui.org> <see-below-2807980057080001@dynamic22.pm01.mv.best.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9f6d,99cbc1eaecee383c X-Google-Attributes: gidf9f6d,public From: mccomb@medieval.org (Todd Michel McComb) Subject: Re: Caller ID and NOSPAM Date: 1998/07/28 Message-ID: <6pktga$1t9$1@machaut.medieval.org> X-Deja-AN: 376212419 Distribution: best References: <6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <see-below-2407982140000001@dynamic57.pm05.mv.best.com> <rone.MonJul27151110PDT1998.10139@ennui.org> <see-below-2807980057080001@dynamic22.pm01.mv.best.com> X-Trace: 901642578 23765 todd 206.184.139.132 Organization: Medieval Music & Arts Foundation Newsgroups: best.general