🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: best.general
Article #1576

Re: 2 Caller ID questions; PacBell answers were unsatisfactory

#1576
From: Tom Holub
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
11 lines
1049 bytes
In article <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com>,
Jason O'Rourke <jor@best.com> wrote:
)
)No, it's basic privacy.  Why do I need to advertise my phone number any
)time I call anyone?  Or put it a different way - what value does CID bring
)to me to justify that? 

The same value that having your e-mail address in your From: line brings;
an open environment where everyone knows who they're talking to and how
to contact them.
 -Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6pl6v6$4u4$1@shell3.ba.best.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6p92nf$fip$1@babylon5.babcom.com> <6p96dj$sfm$15@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9f6d,519821b06b04e0c6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9f6d,public
From: doosh@best.com (Tom Holub)
Subject: Re: 2 Caller ID questions; PacBell answers were unsatisfactory
Date: 1998/07/28
Message-ID: <6pl6v6$4u4$1@shell3.ba.best.com>
X-Deja-AN: 376212431
Distribution: best
References: <6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6p92nf$fip$1@babylon5.babcom.com> <6p96dj$sfm$15@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com>
X-Trace: 901652266 26948 doosh  206.184.139.132
Organization: Best Internet Communications, Inc.
Newsgroups: best.general