Article View: best.general
Article #1576Re: 2 Caller ID questions; PacBell answers were unsatisfactory
From: Tom Holub
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
11 lines
1049 bytes
1049 bytes
In article <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com>, Jason O'Rourke <jor@best.com> wrote: ) )No, it's basic privacy. Why do I need to advertise my phone number any )time I call anyone? Or put it a different way - what value does CID bring )to me to justify that? The same value that having your e-mail address in your From: line brings; an open environment where everyone knows who they're talking to and how to contact them. -Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6pl6v6$4u4$1@shell3.ba.best.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6p92nf$fip$1@babylon5.babcom.com> <6p96dj$sfm$15@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9f6d,519821b06b04e0c6 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9f6d,public From: doosh@best.com (Tom Holub) Subject: Re: 2 Caller ID questions; PacBell answers were unsatisfactory Date: 1998/07/28 Message-ID: <6pl6v6$4u4$1@shell3.ba.best.com> X-Deja-AN: 376212431 Distribution: best References: <6p7q8h$ef1$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6p92nf$fip$1@babylon5.babcom.com> <6p96dj$sfm$15@nntp2.ba.best.com> <6pl62j$h4p$1@shell9.ba.best.com> X-Trace: 901652266 26948 doosh 206.184.139.132 Organization: Best Internet Communications, Inc. Newsgroups: best.general