Article View: best.general
Article #1587Re: The Address Munging Thread
From: Todd Michel McComb
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00
14 lines
1202 bytes
1202 bytes
In article <wksojl357n.fsf@mjf.vip.best.com>, Marty <mjf@best.com> wrote: >What I currently do is a tiny bit complicated, but then I handle a >fairly large volume of mail a day. Yes, when I was getting 100 spams/day, that was with 1000+ legitimate emails. I sorted my mail into folders long before spam was a daily or even monthly occurence, and I've modified the scheme very little. The only difference is that most of the "unidentified" mail (as I called it way back when) is actually spam. >procmail automatically complains to a lot of spam. Ah, I can see why your spam hasn't decreased (as it has for nearly everyone in my usual circle of acquaintences)....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6plor6$2ib$1@machaut.medieval.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6plkqn$617$1@shell3.ba.best.com> <wksojl357n.fsf@mjf.vip.best.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f9f6d,ad596795e97980b7 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9f6d,public From: mccomb@medieval.org (Todd Michel McComb) Subject: Re: The Address Munging Thread Date: 1998/07/28 Message-ID: <6plor6$2ib$1@machaut.medieval.org> X-Deja-AN: 376212451 Distribution: best References: <6plkqn$617$1@shell3.ba.best.com> <wksojl357n.fsf@mjf.vip.best.com> X-Trace: 901670577 4499 todd 206.184.139.132 Organization: Medieval Music & Arts Foundation Newsgroups: best.general