🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: best.general
Article #185

Re: migration problems so far

#185
From: Sam Habash
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 15:33
45 lines
2947 bytes
Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@best.net> wrote:
: x-no-archive: yes

: Daniel Myers <dhm@best.com> wrote:
:> 3.  I forgot to ask them to put in ytalk, but I will next letter.

:         People still use ytalk across networks?  Then again, I shouldn't
:         be surprised, as there's still customers using icb.

In the case of 'icb':

You better believe it.  These people use it knowing full well
that IRC exists, but based on what I gathered, -because- icb is not
IRC and all the baggage associated with it (for better or worse).

I believe the development of icb occured contemporaneously to icb,
though obviously there has been much, much less development effort.

The chat channels we use at my company's hosted mail ops/eng group 
are icb-based.  I use ircII to access them, which seems to work well.  
We used to have an irc/icb gateway but due to the fact the employee 
writing it was laid off (and our irc server was taken down), it's not 
up currently.

:         Just curious, no offense meant or anything: is there really any
:         true purpose to continuing the best.* newsgroups on a Verio
:         news server?

Yes, I've been saying this for ages.  Addressed to the peanut gallery:  
Best is dead.  You guys are now using Verio, whether you like it or not.  
I would be severly disappointed to not see best.* (in all its guises, 
hi Malch!) die when the Best infrastructure is taken down.

:         Seems kind-of self-defeating, that's all.  It's just that after
:         the migration, there won't be any more trace of Best left.  Heck,
:         some have been arguing that for 2 years now.  I'm just trying to
:         figure out why everyone wants to keep the best.* groups.  :-)

I think the populace is suffering from Netcom syndrome.  Never in my
wildest dreams did I imagine this ever happening.

Take care,

--Sam
 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9ruecu$o0f$1@nntp1.ba.best.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news-peer-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!enews.sgi.com!news2.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail
References: <20011030194803.O20312-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> <9rtth2$n7d$1@nntp1.ba.best.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9f6d,ef30c860af3a750a
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9f6d,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-02 07:34:10 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news-peer-west.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!enews.sgi.com!news2.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail
From: Sam Habash <usenet@llama.com>
Newsgroups: best.general
Subject: Re: migration problems so far
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The ISP formerly known as Best
Lines: 45
Sender: Sam Habash <the@best.llama.com>
Distribution: best
Message-ID: <9ruecu$o0f$1@nntp1.ba.best.com>
References: <20011030194803.O20312-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> <9rtth2$n7d$1@nntp1.ba.best.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: llama.com
X-Trace: nntp1.ba.best.com 1004715231 24591 63.194.69.194 (2 Nov 2001 15:33:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@best.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:33:51 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.6-20000803 ("Dust") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.5-STABLE (i386))