🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9tj2gv$as0$1@nntp1.ba.best.com>, malch@malch.com (Malcolm Hoar) wrote:
>The headers added to outgoing messages sent from the migrated
>accounts look barely adequate to me. Anyone else concerned
>that they may trigger various anti-SPAM filters?

It gets worse... the incomplete headers on *incoming* messages
have broken my SPAM filters. In some cases, I can't even get
even get close to the originating IP address. These lame
headers appear to give the spammer almost total anonymity :-(


Received: from sj1-3-4-20.iserver.com (sj1-3-4-20.iserver.com 
[128.121.214.53]) by elsop.com (8.11.6) id fAODbUn29345 for <malch@elsop.com>; 
Sat, 24 Nov 2001 05:37:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Rcpt-To: <malch@elsop.com>
Received: (qmail 60387 invoked by uid 20243); 24 Nov 2001 13:37:30 -0000
Date: 24 Nov 2001 13:37:30 -0000
Message-ID: <20011124133730.60386.qmail@malch.com>
Delivered-To: admin@malch.com
Received: (qmail 60254 invoked by uid 20243); 24 Nov 2001 13:36:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO okyes) ([unknown]) (envelope-sender 
<ZmvbefA@ara.seed.net.tw>)
          by unknown (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <admin@malch.com>; 24 Nov 2001 13:36:24 -0000
From: "�`�N�z�m����"@malch.com
To: MISC5@malch.com, HK-K@malch.com, HK-L@malch.com, MISC1@malch.com,
   MISC2@malch.com, MISC3@malch.com, MISC4@malch.com, HK-E@malch.com,
   HK-F@malch.com, HK-H@malch.com, HK-I@malch.com, HK5@malch.com,
   DESHK87@malch.com, HK1@malch.com, HK2@malch.com, HK4@malch.com,
   DESHK9@malch.com, AOL22@malch.com, AOL30@malch.com, AOL2@malch.com,
   DESHK8@malch.com
Subject: =?big5?Q?=BA=F4=A4W=B8=EA=B0T=AEi?=
MIME-Version: 1.0

-- 
Malcolm Hoar
malch@malch.com
Kant spell Neetchie