🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9tsgf6$qt$1@machaut.medieval.org>, mccomb@medieval.org (Todd Michel McComb) wrote:
>Refusing to provide the same level of logging is inexcusable.
>Silliness doesn't cover it.

That's a pretty fine distinction! 

>Verio's mail setup is high comedy, but I had no intention of using
>their mail anyway (Best's was poor already).

Yup, well my account is toast unless they fix it pronto. I ran
this little test, just to prove that incoming mail is *totally*
untracable. Clearly, I did not send this from <a@b.com> via foo.
The failure to add the IP from which the connection came is also
inexcusable! I did some Googling and it doesn't appear to be a
generic qmail problem/feature -- just a Verio special.

Date: 25 Nov 2001 16:12:12 -0000
Message-ID: <20011125161212.57630.qmail@malch.com>
From: malch@malch.com
Cc: recipient list not shown: ;recipient list not shown:;@b.com
Delivered-To: malch@malch.com
Received: (qmail 57617 invoked by uid 20243); 25 Nov 2001 16:12:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO foo) ([unknown]) (envelope-sender <a@b.com>)
          by unknown (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <malch@malch.com>; 25 Nov 2001 16:12:03 -0000

-- 
Malcolm Hoar
malch@malch.com
Kant spell Neetchie