Thread View: bionet.celegans
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Kathryn Hedges
Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35
Re: Microinjection frustration (Jane Whittingham)
Author: Kathryn Hedges
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:35
30 lines
4291 bytes
4291 bytes
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:42:04 +0000 (GMT) > From: Jane Whittingham <ikklejaneo@yahoo.co.uk> > Subject: [Celegans] Microinjection frustration > To: celegans@magpie.bio.indiana.edu > Message-ID: <213261.65125.qm@web23704.mail.ird.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > I am desparately in need of some help with c. elegans > microinjection.� ... from what I > can tell, my problem is the recovery of the worms.� I > use M9 buffer for recovery and they initially seem to > recover really well, thrashing about in the M9, but once the > M9 is absorbed into the plate and the worm adheres to the > bacterial lawn, the head is still moving around a lot, but > the back end of the worm seems almost paralysed and after a > day or so the worm dies.� Jane, I forwarded your message to our local microinjection expert (Jacob Varkey) and he suggested a different buffer than M9: "Even though it is not necessary, in some cases, I have asked students to use a recovery buffer. There are different formulations of it. One is given below. 3mM HEPES (pH7.2), 3 mM CaCl2, 66mM NaCl, 2.4mM KCl, 4% glucose, 0.1% salmon sperm DNA. Some people simply add 4% glucose to M9. In either case, incubating the worms at 16 C for couple of hrs in recovery buffer (in a moist chamber) before transferring to a seeded plate is recommended." J.Varkey
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads