Article View: bionet.diagnostics
Article #173Re: Question about the legal use of PCR
From: nobody mailtonobody On Behalf Of
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 00:00
80 lines
3066 bytes
3066 bytes
Cool beans! Thanks for giving me the lead... I found Roche's site and will contact those guys and see what happens (??) Brian On 25 Aug 2000 09:28:43 +0100, news@eeyore.ins.cwru.edu [mailto:news@eeyore.ins.cwru.edu] On wrote: > >Hello again, > > I happened to be browsing Roche's USA site and ran across an address >where you can get their licensing info. I expect the info to be the same >for >PCR use in the UK as well as the USA. Here's the quote from one of their >web >pages: "Further information on purchasing licenses to practice the PCR >process may be obtained by contacting the Director of Licensing at the >Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 850 Lincoln Center Drive, Foster City, >California 94404 or at Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 1145 Atlantic Avenue, >Alameda, California 94501." > >Good Luck!!! > > >owner-diagnost@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk wrote: > >> Thanks for your reply. I would have expected the royalty would be >> paid through the purchase of taq, but wasn't sure about the PCR >> technique. I'm a little surprised that the amplification of dna has a >> pattent, even in the 'home made' sense!! >> >> I'll contact our institution's legal counsel. >> >> Thanks >> Brian >> >> On 22 Aug 2000 14:14:15 +0100, news@pale-rider.ins.cwru.edu >> [mailto:news@pale-rider.ins.cwru.edu] wrote: >> >> > >> >Roche owns most, if not all, of the patents for PCR. Although some of >> >the >> >patents have been in litigation for the past year or two, I believe that >> >Roche >> >is still collecting royalties from those labs that continue to use the >> >technique. When I worked for a clinical lab that was using "homebred" >> >PCR >> >protocols we had to pay a royalty to Roche even though we were not using >> >their >> >kits and reagents.. >> > >> >I'm not a legal authority, and I encourage you to consult one (i.e., if >> >you >> >belong to an academic institution you should talk to your institution's >> >legal >> >counsel), but I would expect that you would have to obtain the license >> >and pay >> >the royalty. >> > >> >nobody@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk, [mailto:nobody@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk], On, Behalf, Of >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Can someone tell me if the PCR technique (?? taq-polymerase) can be >> >> used in a plant disease diagnostic lab at a university without a >> >> liscense? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian >> >> >> >> --- >> > > ---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8od5q7$mmk$1@mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10eaff,4fd0787c4f0fe487 X-Google-Attributes: gid10eaff,public From: nobody@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk [mailto:nobody@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Subject: Re: Question about the legal use of PCR Date: 2000/08/28 Message-ID: <8od5q7$mmk$1@mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 663383462 Approved: burns@sasa.gov.uk X-Trace: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk 967449224 1773 193.62.192.80 (28 Aug 2000 07:53:44 GMT) Organization: BIOSCI/MRC Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Aug 2000 07:53:44 GMT Newsgroups: bionet.diagnostics X-Complaints-To: news@net.bio.net