🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bionet.diagnostics
Article #73

taq patent fight

#73
From: David E L Cooke mailtoDCooke
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 00:00
16 lines
1262 bytes
Dear All

There was an article on this issue in Science (vol 286 pg 2251); it is a

complex story.  The whole case, as it stands, involves the native taq.
Three years ago Cetus were judged to have misled the patent office to
gain
the patent but the recent case was to judge if they had done so
deliberately.  Its seems they did as the Patent has now been
invalidated.
Since much of the taq sales are now based on recombinant form (covered
by a different patent) there may be little immediate impact on Roche.
However Promega plan to continue their challenge against other taq
enzymes and the PCR process itself.  The story goes on ......

David
Technical Details
Message-ID: <85k537$dc9$1@mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10eaff,111def2445810d0,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10eaff,public
From: David E L Cooke [mailto:DCooke@scri.sari.ac.uk]
Subject: taq patent fight
Date: 2000/01/13
Message-ID: <85k537$dc9$1@mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 572020896
Approved: odonnell@sasa.gov.uk
X-Trace: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk 947754920 9399 193.62.192.80 (13 Jan 2000 09:15:20 GMT)
Organization: MRC Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre
NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jan 2000 09:15:20 GMT
Newsgroups: bionet.diagnostics
X-Complaints-To: news@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk