Article View: bionet.molbio.evolution
Article #347Re: Several questions on evolution, and mutation (rate)
From: James Foster
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 1996 00:00
70 lines
4565 bytes
4565 bytes
Ram Samudrala (ram@mbisgi.umd.edu) wrote: : >For example, genes which code for one protein in hemoglobin may : >silently duplicate, and only over much time will that duplication : >develop some functionality. : This is what I mean by evolution! Suppose our haemoglobin genes : tomorrow also conferred resistance to malaria (by having a few : mutations). Wouldn't you wonder HOW a new function arose from this : duplication (which must've been both haemoglobin initially), and how : long it took just to come up with it? : >It's pointless to insist on isolating the original duplication event, : >because it was silent. : No, not the original duplication event, but the length of time (and : how) it takes to come up with the new functionality (which has to : happen BEFORE natural selection). Ahhh...gotcha. That is indeed an interesting question. I'm not sure what the answer is. I know that many new functions are co-opted from similar functions (I think the classical example is some enzyme beginning with the letter l...but can't remember right now). But that begs the question of where the co-opted behaviors came from. Similarly, hybridization is a good source of new behavior. But again, you have to have the hybrids to begin with. Still, evolution is a change in distribution of characters...you are focusing on one particular change: from zero to non-zero distribution. That is interesting, and important. : >The important point is that mutation without selection is not a : >particularly interesting concept, from an evolutionary perspective. : We disagree there too, and there's quite a bit of research on this : topic. Basically, the idea is, how long does it take for new function : to evolve, from an existing gene, before naturally selection can : operate on it. How does it evolve? Is it randomly (the current : belief) or is there some directed process going on? OK. You convinced me. Mutation in isolation is an interesting thing to study. I have seen the new evidence supporting some Lamarkian mechanism, so your last question does merit some investigation. Thanks for the discourse. I'm outta here. -- James A. Foster email: foster@cs.uidaho.edu Laboratory for Applied Logic Dept. of Computer Science University of Idaho www: http://www.cs.uidaho.edu/~foster -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzDtvLEAAAEEAKAC21G2Be0K0DMgjLpxrwLmsYfCz8rWcfgyABjr3Ryfk1dO nV7fFFpUF3xohR7die+/B2V9oqRQzTLeSF2ECKlsTY/yUyw2kn+P2ju1umh4Fwzd cVTvc+H69q1+Ft3kmw/PE0Pan+g0PUGGJ43stw3q4OgBHdixbRd/f9giJFDxAAUR tCZKYW1lcyBBLiBGb3N0ZXIgPGZvc3RlckBjcy51aWRhaG8uZWR1PokAlQMFEDIR FaeEvoC3uR1YOQEBOlAEAKIGMgrGku99CVdMKNvme4F2diQBFiDtL7Nyz0c9wVK5 QMQinayA4za6hcJRvFZU663JPjegRxbbjoUkiUTs2G+BXMSM7WI+raywqlBd+dQx zZTMkEzpYeuuyci4aKAvmk7PGuJGw5kRWUbMSdSNiGRWqo6CoW74M2kGsKuSA6ME iQCVAwUQMPxF4Rd/f9giJFDxAQEWsAP/YAW5FZwP/cwQ0LeokwL86vWrGSeOQrtS /5MN/Ysc85gYcFsb0/Ja5dDyh/QN34ljB/+3OU71iTWzXNN2KR+uJqTbUVbRsKiT EMiEDebKmlkhkNZUD0LK8Nge4/kiLU2QG+hxpvzXcnMMtkD7SJU3mx5sZv3NJdHh lrjuGWuId48= =G/K7 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<50pgda$33r@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.A32.3.91.960815144016.39360B-100000@flute.aix.calpoly.edu> <4vvbq4$71g@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <Pine.ULT.3.91.960829233944.7415F-100000@freenet.vcu.edu> <5073o1$bme@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <Dx18DG.E4I@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca> <50hl94$r80@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50l1ea$n30@hecate.umd.edu> <50l5s8$dia@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50lcme$1vr@hecate.umd.edu> <50mtp1$kqn@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50nja2$8hg@hecate.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f665a,66df8aa9a503fb91 X-Google-Attributes: gidf665a,public X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,66df8aa9a503fb91 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: f6a65,66df8aa9a503fb91 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6a65,public X-Google-Thread: 10065c,66df8aa9a503fb91 X-Google-Attributes: gid10065c,public X-Google-Thread: 10a7a9,66df8aa9a503fb91 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a7a9,public From: foster@cs.uidaho.edu (James Foster) Subject: Re: Several questions on evolution, and mutation (rate) Date: 1996/09/06 Message-ID: <50pgda$33r@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> X-Deja-AN: 178891750 distribution: inet references: <Pine.A32.3.91.960815144016.39360B-100000@flute.aix.calpoly.edu> <4vvbq4$71g@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <Pine.ULT.3.91.960829233944.7415F-100000@freenet.vcu.edu> <5073o1$bme@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <Dx18DG.E4I@gpu.utcc.utoronto.ca> <50hl94$r80@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50l1ea$n30@hecate.umd.edu> <50l5s8$dia@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50lcme$1vr@hecate.umd.edu> <50mtp1$kqn@newshound.csrv.uidaho.edu> <50nja2$8hg@hecate.umd.edu> followup-to: bionet.molbio.evolution,sci.bio.technology,sci.bio.misc,sci.math,bionet.microbiology content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII organization: Dept of Computer Science, Univ of Idaho. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: bionet.molbio.evolution,sci.bio.technology,sci.bio.misc,sci.math,bionet.microbiology