Article View: bionet.molbio.evolution
Article #6549Re: molecular clocks
From: Steven Smith
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 1991 03:35
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 1991 03:35
43 lines
2890 bytes
2890 bytes
tomh@BAMBI.CCS.FAU.EDU (Tom Holroyd) writes: >I still wonder about totally neutral mutations. What would be an example? >How do we know a large proportion of bases are silent? Tom, Have you taken a look at any real data? There are numerous examples available in the databases (Genbank etc.) of genes that differ considerable at the nucleic acid level, yet still produce identical amino acid sequences. When discussing the issue of clocks you must make two distinctions. First there is a difference between changes in the genotype and changes in the phenotype. The clock/constant rate arguement can only be discussed reasonably on the genotype, as that is the only place that one can quantitatively measure change. There are organisms on the planet that have demonstrated little change in their phenotype for millions of years. But this is not to say that they have not suffered numerous mutations at the DNA level. These so called "living fossils" such as the crocodile, the selocant (surely misspelled), and in fact many anaerobic bacteria can be demonstrated (by phylogenetic analysis such as parsimony analysis) to be as distant from the protogenote as any of their more contemporary counterparts. This implies that even phenotypically "stable" organisms still fall prey to random mutations. The second issue is that the clock for different genes and gene families is different. That is because the evolutionary pressures on different genes are different. This doesn't mean that the average rate of random mutations differs for these genes. It only means that different genes respond to these mutations in a different way. So trying to use a "clock" to measure the date of divergence between two species one must understand the mutation behavior of the gene in question. This is accomplished by means of comparative analysis on a large number of representitives genes from many different organisms. The fact that clocks differ from gene to gene does not make the agruement for a clock invalid. It can be a useful tool in trying to place dates of divergence of genes as well as whole organisms. Sincerely, Steven Smith Harvard Genome Lab smith@nucleus.harvard.edu --
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<smith.684300922@plasma>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!news.bbn.com!hsdndev!golgi!plasma!smithReferences:
<9109070212.AA19281@bambi.ccs.fau.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a7a9,69df59a5019c44a0 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a7a9,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-09-08 02:23:26 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!news.bbn.com!hsdndev!golgi!plasma!smith From: smith@plasma.harvard.edu (Steven Smith) Newsgroups: bionet.molbio.evolution Subject: Re: molecular clocks Message-ID: <smith.684300922@plasma> Date: 8 Sep 91 03:35:22 GMT References: <9109070212.AA19281@bambi.ccs.fau.edu> Sender: news@nucleus.harvard.edu (NetNews) Distribution: bionet Organization: Harvard Genome Lab Lines: 43 Nntp-Posting-Host: plasma