Article View: bionet.protista
Article #4Re: microsporidian spore request
From: Norman J. Pieniazek x4073
Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 26 May 1995 00:00
118 lines
5523 bytes
5523 bytes
******************* Sorry for second posting of the same message. My previous posting had a wrong subject line. ******************* Michael David Baker posted this message to the bionet.protista group: ====================================================== >From: mike@VOSSBRICKC3.AG.UIUC.EDU > (Michael David Baker) >Newsgroups: bionet.protista >Subject: microsporidian spore requests >Date: 27 Mar 1995 13:48:31 -0800 >Organization: BIOSCI International Newsgroups for > Molecular Biology >Lines: 19 >Sender: daemon@net.bio.net >Distribution: world >Message-lD: <9503272141.AA04137 @ > vossbrinckc3.ag. uiuc.edu > >Dear Netters, >I hope that this is the correct medium for the >following request. I am involved in two major >research projects; 1. the molecular phylogeny of >the microsporidia and 2. molecular identification >of various host strains of Encephalitozoon >cuniculi. We have developed a moderate database of >about 45 complete and 15 partial SSU rRNA >sequences representing about 35 genera of >microsporidia. The results from which we are just >starting to publish. We have also given some >thought to making this database available on the >internet as a tool for identifying species of this >diverse group of organisms. I am currently trying >to obtain more material to sequence and was >wondering if anybody out there, who may have >access to microsporidia, would be interested in >contributing material for these projects. >Sincerely, >Michael D. Baker >mike@vossbrinckc3.ag.uiuc.edu ============================================================ I would like to congratulate your laboratory for this outstanding achievement. Forty five microsporidian complete small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences (SSUrRNA) translates into reading over 350,000 bases with the required redundancy of six to compensate for Taq polymerase errors. Even if your lab did direct sequencing (without cloning) of the PCR product, still over 120,000 bases were read. This calculation does not include the necessary overlaps nor data for the fifteen partial sequences you mentioned. The importance of this accomplishment is immense, both for the taxonomy of microsporidia, as well as for the search of reservoirs of human microsporidial infections. In addition, scientist studying application of microsporidia as biological insect control agents will be able to use the data generated in this project to design species-specific primers to confirm that these microsporidia will not harm beneficial insects. You write that your team "(has) given some thought to making this database available on the internet". In my opinion, this is an excellent idea. However, I would like to note that the GenBank database is where data should be placed to be used "as a tool for identifying species of this diverse group of organisms". I did a quick search of GenBank today and found only two entries from your laboratory of complete microsporidian SSUrRNA coding regions (loci VNRRNS and VAIRGD). One was submitted in 1987 and the other in 1989. Uncommonly, both sequences are identical and are for the same organism, Vairimorpha necatrix. In addition to this sequence, I found in GenBank data from your laboratory for partial sequences for both small and large microsporidian ribosomal RNA. Besides the fact that these sequences have minimal use for molecular taxonomy, they are full of unassigned bases (N), which is not the standard practice in submitting data to this database. Such unassigned bases can be only tolerated in preliminary reports. I find it highly unusual that your laboratory did not send the 45 complete microsporidial SSUrRNA sequences to GenBank, especially that in 1993, complete SSUrRNA sequences were submitted by others to GenBank for 5 species, and in 1994 for nine species of microsporidia. There were up to four sequences submitted for different isolates of the same species from different laboratories. This delay may cause that if your laboratory will not submit "about 45 complete and 15 partial" sequences to GenBank immediately, other laboratories may be faster in making their data available to the scientific community. Please, do not procrastinate any longer in submitting to the GenBank database the sequences you mentioned in this posting. Norman -- ========================================================================== Norman J. Pieniazek voice: (404) 488-4073 Centers for Disease Control fax: (404) 488-4108 Mailstop F13 e-mail: norman@giardia.pdb.cdc.gov 4770 Buford Highway NE Atlanta, GA 30341-3724 ####### The preceding message is not ####### ####### an official document of the CDC. ####### ===========================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3q4pjs$q7r@cdc1.cdc.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1143b2,d8ed73002ba67d45,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1143b2,public X-Google-Thread: 102f42,d8ed73002ba67d45,start X-Google-Attributes: gid102f42,public From: norman@giardia.pdb.cdc.gov (Norman J. Pieniazek x4073) Subject: Re: microsporidian spore request Date: 1995/05/26 Message-ID: <3q4pjs$q7r@cdc1.cdc.gov> X-Deja-AN: 103385256 organization: Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA reply-to: norman@giardia.pdb.cdc.gov newsgroups: bionet.protista,bionet.parasitology