🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <2t7g48$67r@tibalt.supernet.ab.ca> skafte@tibalt.supernet.ab.ca (Greg Skafte) writes:
>Kyle Barger (kbarger@haverford.edu) wrote:
>> In article <1994Jun8.182927.17722@news.yale.edu>,
>> una@doliolum.biology.yale.edu (Una Smith) wrote:
>
>> But the question is whether there ought to be a hierarchy for
>> humanistically-oriented newsgroups, in the same way we currently have sci.*
>  
>  on internet does not soc.* and talk.* cover humanistical groups not 
>  to mention many of the duplications in alt.* and rec.*.  Be a news admin
>  if I had my way half the stuff thats out ther would get turf, I don't
>  need another heirarchy of (please excuse the insensitivity ) wining.

 Pretty stupid attitude, isn't it? Do you associate humanities with whining
while science is pure and golden? I take it you're a scientist? And have you
never heard of Immanuel Velikovsky, Ludwig Plutonium, Alexander Abian, Ted
Holden and their ilk? Here's a free clue: the science newsgroups can be just
as daft as the humanities ones are at times.

 BTW, I think you'll find there's already a couple of newsgroups specifically
for alcohol and drink in general ("wining")...

-- 
   |    Chris Owen, Trinity College, Oxford | tr95006@black.ox.ac.uk    |
   |--------------------------------------------------------------------|
   | Canter and Siegel's criminal Armenian grandparents have committed  |
   | genocide on 2.5 million Green Cards in order to MAKE.MONEY.FAST... |