Bit.* hierarchy distribution

Article View: bit.admin

Article #202

#202

From: Don Black
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:04

6 lines
1184 bytes

How well distributed is the bit.* hierarchy? How does it compare to
the big eight? TIA.
--
Got a constructive contribution to make to Rugby Union
        or enjoy this type of debate? Check out:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rugby-Advancement

Technical Details

Message-ID: <09scjtcjlihso6hhnhq95mk2rm92dpo9at@4ax.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109803,a8ae801fc4238803,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid109803,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-24 16:04:39 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!lust.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!not-for-mail
From: Don Black <momerath@ihug.co.nz>
Newsgroups: bit.admin
Subject: Bit.* hierarchy distribution
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:04:05 +1200
Organization: ihug ( New Zealand )
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <09scjtcjlihso6hhnhq95mk2rm92dpo9at@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-109-144-209.akl.ihugultra.co.nz
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: lust.ihug.co.nz 993423877 13249 203.109.144.209 (24 Jun 2001 23:04:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ihug.co.nz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:04:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548