test

Article View: bit.admin

Article #206

#206

From: Sharon Whitfield
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 22:24

10 lines
1015 bytes


Don Black wrote:

> How well distributed is the bit.* hierarchy? How does it compare to
> the big eight? TIA.
> --
> Got a constructive contribution to make to Rugby Union
>         or enjoy this type of debate? Check out:
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rugby-Advancement

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3B3FA32F.444EA157@pitt.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!pitt.edu!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109803,1f4906fbfa96f010
X-Google-Attributes: gid109803,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-03 11:53:21 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsflash.concordia.ca!pitt.edu!not-for-mail
From: Sharon Whitfield <smwst41@pitt.edu>
Newsgroups: bit.admin
Subject: test
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 18:24:47 -0400
Organization: University of Pittsburgh
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <3B3FA32F.444EA157@pitt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: helpdesk-pc8.cssd.pitt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en