Article View: bit.admin
Article #384Re: Bit.* Hierarchy Question
From: Bob Stock
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 00:00
18 lines
1098 bytes
1098 bytes
grobe+news@netins.net (Jonathan Grobe) wrote: >Peter O'Donnell is the last person known to be in charge. >Try calling him at 202-885-2270 From O'Donnell: > disarray? what needs to be done? only a small number of people >have contacted me for bit changes, and those changes have been made. i am >now authoritative for the bit groups--all requests should be made to me. I sent a message directly to Peter. He has not replied. As far as I'm concerned, this lack of response only serves to confirm what I already knew. Unless there is some other viable alternative to American, the bit.* hierarchy is unreliable. Bob
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<34e5d09a.4572633@news.ucla.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<34e23235.12946249@news.ucla.edu> <slrn6e4qj6.oc6.grobe+news@worf.netins.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109803,58f4cc8cb59decb7 X-Google-Attributes: gid109803,public From: bstock@ucla.edu (Bob Stock) Subject: Re: Bit.* Hierarchy Question Date: 1998/02/14 Message-ID: <34e5d09a.4572633@news.ucla.edu> X-Deja-AN: 325071402 References: <34e23235.12946249@news.ucla.edu> <slrn6e4qj6.oc6.grobe+news@worf.netins.net> Organization: University of California, Los Angeles Newsgroups: bit.admin