Article View: bit.admin
Article #403Re: Person in charge of the Bit*
From: Herschel Browne
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 00:00
63 lines
3478 bytes
3478 bytes
In article <6ia491$1t0c@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU>, wsm0@Lehigh.EDU says... > >(posted also to lstown-l) > >Gateway status: > >As best I can determine (based on my mailing list), mail is flowing from >usenet to the mailing list. But it is not working in the reverse >direction - mail from the mailing lists is not getting through the >gateway to usenet. This started on Tuesday 4/21. This seems to be true, all right. >On Saturday 4/25 I sent the above info to AU. Peter at AU forwarded >my message to the Unix guys who maintain some aspect of the machines >or gateway (Peter is no longer involved). This isn't quite so. Peter is still our main Unix guy, and still has responsibility for the usenet and listserv processes that run in a Unix environment. The actual gateway runs on VM, however, and Peter was (mistakenly, I believe) under the impression that the problem we're currently experiencing was with the VM-resident gateway. I believe the real problem is on our Unix-resident news server. I hope to have it fixed by tomorrow. >I sent a followup message to these two early this week. They have not >contacted me nor have they posted any followup information to bit.admin. Please forgive our lack of responsiveness. The last few weeks have been rough for many of us, with deaths in families, illnesses, major changes in computing systems, and so on, and frankly the usenet-listserv gateway, being at best tangential to our institutional mission, is a very low priority item. >Now, almost one week later, it appears it wont be fixed, even though >it's probably very simple to fix. It will be fixed. >To state the obvious, regardless of the situation we should all be >polite in our dealings with AU. Whomever we contact is probably not >a decision maker. We should be glad they supported us thus far, >even if the lack of notice and the procedure for eliminating their >gateway service has been dismal. I don't know where this rumor that we were eliminating our gateway service came from. We will indeed have to drop it or replace it with something else eventually, but we have no intention of discontinuing it immediately. Because it runs on VM, and because we will be de-installing VM, we will have to stop doing what we're doing now, but that is some time off. We'll be running VM and the gateway at least till the end of 1998--unless, of course, someone out there wants to take it on before then. -- Herschel Browne hersch@american.edu You never know what is Director, Network Software enough unless you know American University what is more than enough. Washington, DC 20016 202-885-3802 --Wm. Blake
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6ianp0$qi3$1@supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6hq6a4$1bk_002@gemery.tiac.net> <6hqa85$crs@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> <6i58gp$hqo@examiner.concentric.net> <6ia491$1t0c@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109803,bfad8e3d2a6837d X-Google-Attributes: gid109803,public From: hersch@american.edu (Herschel Browne) Subject: Re: Person in charge of the Bit* Date: 1998/04/30 Message-ID: <6ianp0$qi3$1@supernews.com> X-Deja-AN: 349220552 References: <6hq6a4$1bk_002@gemery.tiac.net> <6hqa85$crs@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> <6i58gp$hqo@examiner.concentric.net> <6ia491$1t0c@ns4-1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com X-Trace: 893968992 IIN0V791A34F89309C usenet58.supernews.com Organization: American University Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: bit.admin