Re: Gateway CONYERS under discussion

Article View: bit.admin

Article #877

#877

From: Jim McIntosh
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 00:00

14 lines
1049 bytes

In article <1771BF542.DRZYMALA@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu>,
DRZYMALA@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu (JIM DRZYMALA) wrote:
> I am requesting that a bi-directional gateway be established for the CONYERS
> listserv list.  The address is CONYERS@UBVM.CC.BUFFALO.EDU
>  
> Please forward your comments to the bit-admin newsgroup.

Jim, wasn't this proposed once before and then withdrawn. I can't
remember the reason. Can you fill us in on the history, what the
objection was and why the objection no longer applies? Thanks.

Jim McIntosh (jim@american.edu)
The American University
Washington, DC USA 20016-8019

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Jim.McIntosh-2801962015330001@dial19.dialin.american.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <1771BF542.DRZYMALA@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109803,3dcdc81452d4732f
X-Google-Attributes: gid109803,public
From: Jim.McIntosh@American.Edu (Jim McIntosh)
Subject: Re: Gateway CONYERS under discussion
Date: 1996/01/28
Message-ID: <Jim.McIntosh-2801962015330001@dial19.dialin.american.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 136881479
references: <1771BF542.DRZYMALA@ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu>
organization: The American University
newsgroups: bit.admin

Reply to Parent Message