Thread View: bit.admin
3 messages
3 total messages
Started by Bob Sloane
Wed, 26 Feb 1992 22:31
New groups from TWNMOE10.bitnet gateway
Author: Bob Sloane
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1992 22:31
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1992 22:31
10 lines
1040 bytes
1040 bytes
Hi, I just got a couple of artilces for bit.listserv groups that didn't have any newgroups posted for them. One way b.l.pascal-l and the other was b.l.info-vax. They seems to be gateway via something called the twnmoe10.bitnet gateway. Does anyone have any idea what is going on? Is this a local gateway leaking, or are these "official" groups? -- USmail: Bob Sloane, University of Kansas Computer Center, Lawrence, KS, 66045 E-mail: sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu, sloane@ukanvax.bitnet, AT&T: (913)864-0444
Re: New groups from TWNMOE10.bitnet gateway
Author: Ken Connelly
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1992 16:10
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1992 16:10
18 lines
1761 bytes
1761 bytes
In article <1992Feb26.163118.38213@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane) writes: > I just got a couple of artilces for bit.listserv groups that didn't > have any newgroups posted for them. One way b.l.pascal-l and the > other was b.l.info-vax. They seems to be gateway via something called > the twnmoe10.bitnet gateway. Does anyone have any idea what is going > on? Is this a local gateway leaking, or are these "official" groups? I saw those, too. We certainly DON'T have any need for b.l.info-vax, since that list is fed to comp.os.vms and vice versa. I don't know about pascal-l. I might guess that there is a gateway for it via comp.lang.pascal, but that's only a guess. -- =========================================================================== Ken Connelly, Systems/Operations Manager Internet: connelly@uni.edu Information Systems and Computing Services University of Northern Iowa USWestNet: (319) 273-2357 Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0121 FAX: (319) 273-3509 ===========================================================================
Re: New groups from TWNMOE10.bitnet gateway
Author: Jim McIntosh
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 1992 13:11
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 1992 13:11
15 lines
1298 bytes
1298 bytes
In article <1992Feb26.163118.38213@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>, sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane) says: >I just got a couple of artilces for bit.listserv groups that didn't >have any newgroups posted for them. One way b.l.pascal-l and the >other was b.l.info-vax. They seems to be gateway via something called >the twnmoe10.bitnet gateway. Does anyone have any idea what is going >on? Is this a local gateway leaking, or are these "official" groups? These are not on the list of list of registered gateway'ed lists. I have to presume TWNMOE10 is letting them escape by accident. I will write to the folks at TWNMOE10 and let them know. --- Jim McIntosh (jim@american.edu) The American University Washington DC 20016-8019 USA
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads