Article View: bit.databases.mssql-l
Article #162Re: differences between sql on Win98 vs sql on NT
From: orangevwbus
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:28
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:28
10 lines
1396 bytes
1396 bytes
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:46:10 -0400, "MSN News" <jcs1000@yahoo.com> wrote: >Are there any known differences between SQL v7 on Win98 vs NT? tia. > > I don't believe that SQL7 installed on Win98, NTWks4.0, or Win2Kprof will support replication. Other than that, you should have a full blown database. I'm not sure how good your throughput will be if you're running it from 98 as a network app.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3b2ffc14.519293274@netnews.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.71!wnfilter1!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<ePoc3Xh9AHA.256@cpmsnbbsa09>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6611,48f9ea98559eadb5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-19 18:28:15 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!135.173.83.71!wnfilter1!worldnet-localpost!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: robd@globalaz.com (orangevwbus) Newsgroups: bit.databases.mssql-l Subject: Re: differences between sql on Win98 vs sql on NT Message-ID: <3b2ffc14.519293274@netnews.worldnet.att.net> References: <ePoc3Xh9AHA.256@cpmsnbbsa09> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Lines: 10 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:28:14 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.83.65.218 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 993000494 12.83.65.218 (Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:28:14 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:28:14 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet