Re: wfwg and SQL Server

Article View: bit.databases.mssql-l

Article #2003

Back to bit.databases.mssql-l Previous Next

#2003

From: David May
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1995 00:00

21 lines
1187 bytes

Chris Gadsby (cjg2@STUDENT.OPEN.AC.UK) wrote:

: PS - In the end having set this up we never found the Network
: Integration Kit ot be as robust as Named Pipes (dispite microsofts
: claims) and went replaces wfwg by win 3.1.


: Hope this helps

Yes, that is helpful. Does installing the Network intergration Kit replace
Named Pipes or can they live beside each other? 

We may go to the Windows NT version of the SQL Server, does this solve the
workgroup problem?

A
--
David May                               | I've never killed a man, but I've
davidmay@astro.ocis.temple.edu          | read many obituaries with great
                                        | pleasure.
                                        | -Clarence Darrow

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3lmu2i$kdb@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <memo.27451@cosy.open.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f6611,98f7f337225effab
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public
From: davidmay@astro.ocis.temple.edu (David May)
Subject: Re: wfwg and SQL Server
Date: 1995/04/02
Message-ID: <3lmu2i$kdb@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 100734952
references: <memo.27451@cosy.open.ac.uk>
organization: Temple University, Academic Computer Services
newsgroups: bit.databases.mssql-l

Reply to Parent Message