Article View: bit.databases.mssql-l
Article #2026Adding second processor
From: mark.a.heller
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 00:00
9 lines
1038 bytes
1038 bytes
Actually I have two questions: 1. I have a Compaq Proliant 2000 with one processor and have found that when my users are hitting two or three of the applications on my SQL server the processor usage can remain at 90-100% for up to ten minutes. In the 2000, I have the ability to add a second processor, will the increase in performance gained by adding a second processor outweigh the $2000 price tag? 2. How do I get in touch with the administrator of this mailing list. I would like to change my mailing address if possible.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9504251945.AA3681@CServe-Hub2.inhouse.compuserve.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6611,a13c80c765f20014,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf6611,public From: "mark.a.heller" <mark.a.heller@AA.COMPUSERVE.COM> Subject: Adding second processor Date: 1995/04/25 Message-ID: <9504251945.AA3681@CServe-Hub2.inhouse.compuserve.com> X-Deja-AN: 101647563 sender: Microsoft SQL Server Discussion List comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU content-type: Text/Plain mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: bit.databases.mssql-l