Article View: bit.ecology
Article #630Biodiversity, conservation, etc.
From: Peterson_James/r
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00
23 lines
1273 bytes
1273 bytes
If we as natural resource professionals (aka. scientsts, ecologists et al.) cannot agree on an acceptable definition of biodiversity (not to mention other terms), then how do we expect J.Q. Public to take us seriously? I can envision a day in the near future where we will be the subject of riddles such as: Q: How many ecologists does it take to define biodiversity? A: Less than a million. "It is not the nomenclature that matters but the clear definitions of the contents given to terms, a truism most frequently misunderstood" - E. Balon ********************************************* * James T. Peterson * * USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station * * 316 E. Myrtle Street * * Boise, Idaho, 83702 USA * * Phone:(208)373-4379, FAX:(208)373-4391 * *********************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199801231939.LAA07255@igc7.igc.o>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10dd57,59728983b67cc814,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10dd57,public From: Peterson_James/r@FS.FED.US Subject: Biodiversity, conservation, etc. Date: 1998/01/23 Message-ID: <199801231939.LAA07255@igc7.igc.o> X-Deja-AN: 318703177 Sender: ECOLOG-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU X-Gateway: notes@gn.apc.org Newsgroups: bit.ecology