🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: bit.ecology
Article #630

Biodiversity, conservation, etc.

#630
From: Peterson_James/r
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00
23 lines
1273 bytes
If we as natural resource professionals (aka. scientsts,
ecologists et al.) cannot agree on an acceptable definition
of biodiversity (not to mention other terms), then how do
we expect J.Q. Public to take us seriously?  I can envision
a day in the near future where we will be the subject of riddles
such as:

Q: How many ecologists does it take to define biodiversity?
A: Less than a million.

"It is not the nomenclature that matters but the clear definitions of
the contents given to terms, a truism most frequently misunderstood"

 - E. Balon

*********************************************
*             James T. Peterson             *
*    USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station   *
*           316 E. Myrtle Street            *
*         Boise, Idaho, 83702  USA          *
*  Phone:(208)373-4379, FAX:(208)373-4391   *
*********************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID: <199801231939.LAA07255@igc7.igc.o>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10dd57,59728983b67cc814,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10dd57,public
From: Peterson_James/r@FS.FED.US
Subject: Biodiversity, conservation, etc.
Date: 1998/01/23
Message-ID: <199801231939.LAA07255@igc7.igc.o>
X-Deja-AN: 318703177
Sender: ECOLOG-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU
X-Gateway: notes@gn.apc.org
Newsgroups: bit.ecology