Article View: bit.ecology
Article #633Re: to Preserve or Conserve ?
From: grant
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 00:00
19 lines
1416 bytes
1416 bytes
Among all of us conservationists there is a continuum of beliefs that ranges between those who want to conserve nature because of the material importance of natural products and services for people, to the more 'environmentalist' position of nature for nature's sake. I probably stand closer to the latter. However, I reject the proposition that environmentalists or preservationsists want to maintain an unrealitic pristine state, and I accept that humans are part of nature. What I believe we should try to preserve and conserve are the natural functions of the biosphere, permitting any and all natural change to take place. I define a natural system or natural process as one in which human influence is not the dominant factor. Although humans are natural, we are in a class by ourselves, mostly because our technology allows us to escape from the limits of metabolic energy. No other single species has near the capacity to alter the biosphere in the short term that we have.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<199801240030.QAA24044@igcb.igc.o>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<199801231732.JAA01820@igc7.igc.o>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10dd57,14f3127f4a778a22 X-Google-Attributes: gid10dd57,public From: grant@HAWAII.EDU Subject: Re: to Preserve or Conserve ? Date: 1998/01/23 Message-ID: <199801240030.QAA24044@igcb.igc.o> X-Deja-AN: 318744236 Sender: ECOLOG-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU References: <199801231732.JAA01820@igc7.igc.o> X-Gateway: notes@gn.apc.org Newsgroups: bit.ecology