Article View: bit.listserv.aect-l
Article #3609Re: AECT Convention Paper Guidelines
From: reigelut
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 14:56
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 1994 14:56
45 lines
2849 bytes
2849 bytes
I think Gary Morrison has raised attention to two very important issues,
and I support his position on both.
I do believe that we need to have some limit on the number of presentations
a person gives at the annual conference, but limiting any author to two
listings in the program is too limiting. AERA's limits to two first
authorships and a total of five listings in the program (or even four)
seems much more reasonable to me.
I am a strong proponent of blind review. Just like manuscript reviews for
a journal, a presentation proposal should be judged on its merits, not on
the author's reputation or popularity.
I applaud Gary for raising these issues.
A related problem I would like to raise is that I have often found myself
with no sessions of interest to me in a time slot at the conference. It
seems that there are considerably fewer offerings in each time slot than at
other conferences, like AERA. Now, AECT is smaller than AERA, but I would
be interested in knowing how the number of sessions per attendee compares.
Would anyone be willing to dig up some data on this?
I would like to see more sessions, and I would expect that offering more
sessions would help attract more attendees to subsequent conferences. How
much would it cost to get a couple of additional presentation rooms? How
many additional registrations would be required to break even? It would be
interesting to collect some data and even run an experiment!
Charlie
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% %
% Charlie Reigeluth %
% Education 2236 %
% Indiana University %
% Bloomington, IN 47405 %
% %
% reigelut@indiana.edu %
% Phone: 812-856-8464 %
% Secretary: 856-8477 %
% Fax: 856-8239 %
% %
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<AECT-L%94070510540378@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!eff!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!panther.Gsu.EDU!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCS.INDIANA.EDU!reigelutShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f8ed4,14210e20cf24066e X-Google-Attributes: gidf8ed4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-07-05 08:14:42 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!eff!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!panther.Gsu.EDU!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCS.INDIANA.EDU!reigelut Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aect-l Message-ID: <AECT-L%94070510540378@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU> Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 09:56:17 -0500 Sender: AECT Issues Discussion Group <AECT-L@WVNVM.BITNET> From: reigelut@UCS.INDIANA.EDU Subject: Re: AECT Convention Paper Guidelines Lines: 44