🚀 go-pugleaf

I generally support Denis Hlynka's comments.  The repeated use of
"dynamic" throughout the proposed mission statement, etc. has
bothered me from the start.

I don't agree, however, with Denis' suggestion to add the word
I also agree with Denis' suggestion to add the word "appropriate"
(appropriate and effective application...).

And, in response, to Dick Cornell's request for comments on the
meaning of instructional technology, I applaud definitions which
do not equate technology with the use of hardware (computers or
otherwise).  I believe we should cultivate the broadest use of
the term technology (the application of science to practical
problems).  That definition emphasizes the importance of
recognizing what we learn through the scientific process about
all aspects of instruction and learning, not merely aspects
related to computers and other hardware.

On the issue of whether to include "in all cultures," I also
agree with Denis.  I believe the addition of "appropriate"
addresses that issue (and others).

Peggy Cole
pcole@cudnvr.denver.colorado.edu