Article View: bit.listserv.appc-l
Article #450Re: TP instances
From: Tom Thomas
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 22:14
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 22:14
15 lines
1663 bytes
1663 bytes
> While it is true that a new TP instance is generated for each > CMACCP, it is not true that after deallocating there are "orphan" > tp instances lying around. They are cleaned up when the last > conversation using them ends. If I use the APPC DISPLAY verb (CM/2 1.0) after the program has been running for a while, I'll see many instances of the TP, all of which have 0 conversations associated with them, except for the most recent cmaccp(). If I Ctl-Brk the .exe, then DISPLAY shows no instances of the TP. It is appearing to me that the cleanup does not occur until the process is terminated. Should this be the behavior?? Is it relevant that *I* do not isse a cmdeal(), but that my partner deallocates (i.e. I get a CM_DEALLOCATED_NORMAL on my last cmrcv(), in which case I do a cmaccp())? Thanks - Tom
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9312152214.AA01109@ponder>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU!thomasShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10aed9,894d77d2e4a94696
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aed9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-15 15:19:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU!thomas
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.appc-l
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:owner-appc-l@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:thomas@PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Message-ID: <9312152214.AA01109@ponder>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1993 16:14:29 CST
Sender: APPC Discussion List <APPC-L@AUVM.BITNET>
From: Tom Thomas <thomas@PONDER.CSCI.UNT.EDU>
Subject: Re: TP instances
In-Reply-To: <9312151809.AA24763@ponder>; from "Richard L. Gray" at Dec 15,
93 12:55 pm
Lines: 14