TPIDs

Article View: bit.listserv.appc-l

Article #453

Back to bit.listserv.appc-l Previous Next

#453

From: Richard L. Gray ((919) 254-7408)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 12:59

9 lines
1247 bytes

Ummmm, Peter, you are correct for the native APPC API on OS/2.  However,
*CPIC* should clean up the TPID for you when the last conversation to
use it ends.  Otherwise you will eventually exhaust all available
storage, not to mention the questions of which one to use when performing
work on behalf of a client (in a cascaded server scenario, perhaps).
Programmers should *not* be *forced* to use the new extensions to make
their code robust.
Regards,
Richard.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <APPC-L%93121708070762@AMERICAN.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VNET.IBM.COM!rlgray

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10aed9,ee547f6b576f8059,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aed9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-12-17 08:51:06 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!VNET.IBM.COM!rlgray
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.appc-l
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:owner-appc-l@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU>
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU,@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU:rlgray@VNET.IBM.COM>
X-Addr: Internet:  rlgray@vnet.ibm.com NO SNIVELING!
Message-ID: <APPC-L%93121708070762@AMERICAN.EDU>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 1993 07:59:07 EST
Sender: APPC Discussion List <APPC-L@AUVM.BITNET>
From: "Richard L. Gray ((919) 254-7408)" <rlgray@VNET.IBM.COM>
Subject: TPIDs
Lines: 8