🚀 go-pugleaf

Never thought of that.  Excellent idea.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
[mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of Michael Stack
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:48 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Shifting memory to the right


If you're going to do a binary search, why not use a balanced binary search
tree?  If a tree node is a row, your link memory overhead would be
relatively small and your search time would be comparable.  And if you are
not inserting too many rows, the overhead for balancing should be small,
too.  A lot less virtual (and real) memory used, as well.

It's usually (!) less costly to manipulate a data structure than to move
data around.  YMMV.  See Knuth, TAoCP, Vol 3, 2nd Ed. (Sorting and
Searching) pp 471-473 for a discussion of using a balanced tree to
represent a linear list.

Mike

At 09:57 AM 9/30/2005 -0500, Don Nielsen wrote:
> > Why not just have the table entries linked with a "next" pointer ?
>
>Binary searching of the tables after they have been loaded.
>
> > Have a second buffer for the table.
>
>Good thought.  There are three tables involved, which are already very
>large (75 meg between them).  I'll look into a fourth for buffer space.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
>[mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]On Behalf Of Beate Kawelke
>Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:14 AM
>To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Shifting memory to the right
>
>
>Hmmmm - two thoughts:
>
>1. Why not just have the table entries linked with a "next" pointer ? If
>necessary, throw in a "previous" pointer, too. Navigation through the
>table is quite easy, and you can add / delete entries simply by chaining
>them in the right place.
>2. Have a second buffer for the table. Move upper part to buffer, then the
>new entry, then the lower part.
>
>HTH, Beate
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
> > [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Don Nielsen
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 3:56 PM
> > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> > Subject: [ASSEMBLER-LIST] Shifting memory to the right
> >
> > Nothing like a dumb applications programmer question to end
> > the week.  Is there an instruction like MVCL that moves
> > memory starting at the end working to the beginning.  I have
> > a table that is in sequence.  I want to insert a new row,
> > maintaining sequence.  That requires shifting right the end
> > of the table.  It would be great to just code an MVCL to do
> > it, but I would be overwrite data.  But if MVCL started with
> > the last byte and worked its way to the start, then the shift
> > would be easy.  Does any such instruction or function exist?
> >
> > I guess I could do something silly and build the table
> > starting at the end of the of memory block and shift it left
> > as I build it.
> >
> > dvn
> >
> > Don V Nielsen
> > Products & Tools
> > CMS
> > 3707 Corporate Drive
> > Marshfield, WI 54449
> > donn@cmscms.com
> >
> > > '715-486-8807 X434
> > >
> > Better Results, Faster!
> >




Michael Stack                 e-mail:   mstack@niu.edu
                               ear-mail: 1.815.753.9447
Computer Science Department   fax:      1.815.753.0342
Northern Illinois University  www:      http://mstack.cs.niu.edu/
DeKalb, IL  60115             skype:    callto://mstack