🚀 go-pugleaf

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
> [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 11:53 AM
> To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Assembly coding guidelines
>
>
> > 100 characters would work for me. Abandoning the sequence number and
> > adding space would even be a good compromise at this point. While I
> > love the ISPF sequence numbers at the start of a line the sequence
> > numbers at the start of line have been optional for years in xedit.
>
> If you're one of those poor blighted souls who love ISPF, you might be
> severely disappointed if you tried editing text files with record
> lengths greater than the current screen width. ISPF is pretty
> user-hateful on this. (Ask me how I know)
>
> Now admittedly you can define an emulator window with more than 80
> characters, so it's not entirely hopeless, but you'll be pretty
> frustrated nevertheless. SPF/PC and its cousins are much superior in
> this respect because they gracefully handle inserts, nulls etc.
>
> CC

This is likely to be sacrilegious, but I really have gotten to like gvim
on Linux. I don't know how to write "macros" for it, but I've not yet
had too much of a need for that. I simply adore regular expressions.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.