Optimum package size

Article View: bit.listserv.authorware

Article #31143

Back to bit.listserv.authorware Previous Next

#31143

From: Shane Ross
Date: Mon, 30 May 1994 00:39

22 lines
1402 bytes

Hi,

I was wondering which would be the better practice.  Is it better to have
many smaller-sized modules which use many jumpfilereturns to navigate
through each one or is it better to have only a few larger-sized modules
that jumpfile less frequently?  These modules also go onto CD, so
considering drive access speeds etc, which do you think?

Thanx.

shane


----
For a relatively boring time contact :-

Shane Ross
Centre for Interactive Multimedia -- ph. (077) 81 5525
......
....---------------------------  "If I opened your eyes, I would embalm you,
...|   Shane.Ross@jcu.edu.au   |  Banishing you to a truth of confusion."
    ---------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <199405300039.AA10077@marlin.jcu.edu.au>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!demon!uknet!pipex!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!JCU.EDU.AU!Shane.Ross

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f49cb,791de9b78f332e62,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf49cb,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-29 20:28:15 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!demon!uknet!pipex!swrinde!news.dell.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!JCU.EDU.AU!Shane.Ross
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.authorware
X-Sender: imsrr@email.jcu.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <199405300039.AA10077@marlin.jcu.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 30 May 1994 10:39:46 +1000
Sender: Authorware Professional <AWARE@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be>
From: Shane Ross <Shane.Ross@JCU.EDU.AU>
Subject: Optimum package size
Lines: 21