Article View: bit.listserv.authorware
Article #31147Authorware vs. Director
From: Ahron Shtull-Trauing
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 20:14
Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 20:14
47 lines
3159 bytes
3159 bytes
For a long time I have been debating whether or not to continue to use Authorware as my CD-ROM development tool. The main pro is the ease of cross-platform development. The second pro is ease of development. Cons are many: 1. Macromedia's lack of commitment of resources to Authorware 2. 1-2% royalty (rumors to the contrary Macromedia has not yet removed these) 3. Limited support for layering (why can't I do transparancy of QT movies backgrounds) 4. Poor support for sound (one track only) 5. Poor support for timing 6. Limited graphics editing capability I know that authorware was meant to be a training tool, but it has so much potential as being the best and easiest to use multimedia authoring environment. Because of point 1, however, I think it fails to live up to this potential. I looked into alternatives (passport Pro seemed the most promising but its performance was poor and worst of all it only supports the System Palette - a major sin in multimedia). With Director 4.0, Macromedia has made my choice inevitable. Besides being exactly the opposite on all 6 points above, cross-platform support is even better. When DfW hits the shelf in July, you'll be able to quite easily develop a hybrid CD since the programs are *binary* compatible (unlike authorware). BTW, just to bolster my point further - which Macromedia product is native first on the PPC? Which will support 3DO and Script-X first? Director 4.0 has pushed Authorware back into being a niche product - good for training (a big niche, but a niche nonetheless) but not for all-around multimedia. So, I'll go out and pay for my lingo programmer - hey, its cheaper than cracking my head against the wall each time I run into another limitation of authorware. Maybe, just maybe, Macromedia will wake up and roll these products into one. Think of the ease of use of Authorware programming with the power of Director - one hell of a program. I've said this before on this list - if Macromedia doesn't wake up someone else will. BTW, does anyone know the mailing address for the Director list :)? Also, I'll still be using authorware as a prototytping tool, so no, I don't plan to sell my license for cheap ;) Also, I'll still be reading this list - and writing nasty comments once in a while <g>. Aron Shtull-Trauring aronst@zeus.datasrv.co.il
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.3.89.1.2.9405252229.D18860-0100000@zeus.datasrv.co.il>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!netcomsv!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ZEUS.DATASRV.CO.IL!aronstShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f49cb,efff9451598582f4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf49cb,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-29 20:28:16 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!get.hooked.net!decwrl!decwrl!amd!netcomsv!netcomsv!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ZEUS.DATASRV.CO.IL!aronst Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: bit.listserv.authorware Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.1.2.9405252229.D18860-0100000@zeus.datasrv.co.il> Date: Wed, 25 May 1994 23:14:24 +0300 Sender: Authorware Professional <AWARE@cc1.kuleuven.ac.be> From: Ahron Shtull-Trauing <aronst@ZEUS.DATASRV.CO.IL> Subject: Authorware vs. Director In-Reply-To: <199405251917.AA18375@zeus.datasrv.co.il> Lines: 46