Re: Is this group dead?????

Article View: bit.listserv.authorware

Article #31252

Back to bit.listserv.authorware Previous Next

#31252

From: 93conner
Date: Thu, 19 May 1994 02:21

13 lines
1009 bytes

In article <onesty.44.000FE9EC@vt.edu>, onesty@vt.edu (Bill Onesty) writes:
> Is it?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dead is such a final term.  Perhaps dormant is the word we should use.  It 
seems to me with such a wide range of topics one could choose to talk about 
which apply to this group we could get a rather interesting thread going 
here.

Bill, how about starting us off on somthing completely new?

DTC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1994May18.222142.18195@wmichgw>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!demon!bt!uknet!pipex!sunic!EU.net!uunet!gumby!wmichgw!93conner

References: <onesty.44.000FE9EC@vt.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f49cb,31f62525d1b41d50
X-Google-Attributes: gidf49cb,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-18 20:30:02 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!demon!bt!uknet!pipex!sunic!EU.net!uunet!gumby!wmichgw!93conner
From: 93conner@wmich.edu
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.authorware
Subject: Re: Is this group dead?????
Message-ID: <1994May18.222142.18195@wmichgw>
Date: 18 May 94 22:21:42 EDT
References: <onesty.44.000FE9EC@vt.edu>
Organization: Western Michigan University
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message