Thread View: bit.listserv.basque-l
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Lagun Batzuen
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
Re: Ex-president 'troubled' by raids on Iraq (Irish News) (fwd)
Author: Lagun Batzuen
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
104 lines
5030 bytes
5030 bytes
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 11:51:26 -0500 (EST) From: Lagun Batzuen <lagunak@panix.com> To: F. Stuart Ross <fsross@mailbox.syr.edu> Cc: Ireland_list@email.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Ex-president 'troubled' by raids on Iraq (Irish News) On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, F. Stuart Ross wrote: > > ********************* > THE IRISH NEWS > ********************* > Friday, 18 Dec., 1998 > > > Ex-president 'troubled' by raids on Iraq > > By Michael O'Toole > Dublin Correspondent [erase] > "It is primarily in the hands of Saddam Hussein, as with the other > And former taoiseach Albert Reynolds yesterday added his voice to the > condemnation of the attacks on Iraq. > > Mr Reynolds was at the centre of diplomatic moves last month to avoid > US strikes on Iraq and visited the middle eastern state three weeks > ago, where he met Saddam Hussein. > > He said: "I'm as surprised as everyone else was because all the efforts > that all of us made back in November to get inspections resumed were > successful. > > "I certainly don't know what happened to spark it off this time. > > "I would prefer the talking take place rather than the war. I would > advocate always that people take risks for peace and not for war. > > "I just don't know what the justification for last night's decision > is." Well, maybe here are some clues: "Butler's conclusions were welcome in Washington, which helped orchestrate the terms of the Australian diplomat's report. Sources in New York and Washington said Clinton administration officials played a direct role in shaping Butler's text during multiple conversations with him Monday at secure facilities in the U.S. mission to the United nations. Spokesmen for Butler and the Clinton administration declined to comment on those conversations." This paragraph comes from an article by Barton Gellman published in the Washington Post. The whole article: Iraq Hasn't Cooperated, Arms Inspector Reports By Barton Gellman Wednesday, December 16, 1998; Page A01 http:www.washingtonpost.com > Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams also called for an end to the raids. > > He said: "The UN should resume with the process of dialogue as quickly > as possible in order to move beyond this crisis and find a long-term > solution to the situation in the gulf.'' I agree with Mr. Adams on this %100 but let's not forget that 1) the UN is dominated by the U.S.; 2) since the Reagan years, the U.S. has officially re-interpreted Article 51 of the UN Charter designed by to justify its repeated reliance on force, and that has become more ludicrous in the Clinton years. Ambassador Albright: "the U.S. will act unilaterally when we must in an area important for our interests"; and 3) the U.S. supported Saddam during his worse crimes to "preserve stability", and now wants him out, killed, and then Washington would have the best of all worlds: an iron-fisted military junta without Saddam. Most of the international community opposes a military solution to the crisis, yet the U.S. repeatedly stated it would act unilaterally if necessary -- only its British lieutenant has offered unconditional support. I was and still am concerned with U.S. intervention and role in Britain's Stormont accord (and Basque leaders seeking U.S. involvement in the current Basque pseudo peace process) because of, among other things, its insistence on its right to use force (euphemism for state terrorism) whatever international law requires, and whatever international institutions decide. George Shultz on Iraq: "Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table" condemning those who advocate "utopian, legalistic means like outside mediation, the United Nations and the World Court." If Saddam still is there is because the U.S. preferred Saddam to the rebelling forces in 1991 and refused to do anything with them before or after the Gulf war, virtually excluding them from U.S. media, apart from marginal dissident publications. In my opinion, the war against Iraq could be stopped if there was substantial popular pressure from within the U.S., Europe, and Britain. But right now it doesn't seem likely. Maybe I'm too pesimistic. Jokin Z. Anai Artea - Boston --------
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads