🚀 go-pugleaf

"Randy McLaughlin" <randy@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:a%J0e.55323$6g7.46631@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> "NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote in message
> news:EW50e.104353$gJ3.49079@clgrps13...
> >
> > "Randy McLaughlin" <randy@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:flN%d.44821$c72.4070@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> >
> >> If that true then why are you here?  It sounds like others do want to
> >> "chance" it here, whatever chance means.
> >
> > That's a very hostile reply. I keep an eye here so I can round up lost
> > souls
> > and point them to the mail lists. It's a dirty job, but it beats being
> > Christina Aguilera's underwear consultant.

> No my response was not hostile in any way.  I was curious why you would go
> somewhere you don't believe is worth going to.
>
> If you said that you just forgot to unsubscribe from it fine, you would
now
> be able to decide whether you want to come back or go ahead and
> un-subscribe.

I assume from your statement (despite it's ambiguity) that you know little
of Usenet or what it means to 'subscribe' or 'unsubscribe'.

> Your reply is extremely hostile.  If a store opened up down the street
from
> a store you went to and you hung out at the new store telling the
customers
> not to shop there you would be arrested for trespassing.

If the old store burnt down and I stood outside pointing customers to the
new store I'd get hearty thanks and tips. Wasn't it you who constantly
abused others like me who assisted people who were looking for Coco help?
Why is it your job to force everyone to go where you wish? Who made you god?

> You have decided you know what others need to do and hang around places
you
> don't want them to go to try and keep them out.  I can't think of anything
> any more hostile.

Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. I also help tourists who are lost.

> Do you happen to believe in Orwell's thought police too?

Apparently you do Randy.

N