🚀 go-pugleaf

"NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote in message news:BN31e.6887$x8.5854@edtnps90...
>
> "Randy McLaughlin" <randy@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:CaM0e.87035$%Y4.66416@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>
>> I use outlook express and you must subscribe and unsubscribe from Usenet
>> groups to have them on your list.
>
> Then you misunderstand what the software is doing. 'Subscribe' merely 
> means
> 'take notice of'. No actual information is sent to or received from the
> server in doing this.

Shows you are as dense as you act, I never said anything about any server.

I talked about subscribing to this group, it is a term used by 99% of 
everyone using Usenet, anyone using Micro$loth software.

>> Someone wanted everyone to leave this group to join his.  He tried 
>> burning
>> it down and failed.
>
> You've been told this is a lie. You seem unable to comprehend it. Some
> little asshole, for reasons no one ever understood, decided to screw up 
> this
> news group by attracting as much spam and porn to it as he could. Tiring 
> of
> this, we all went over to a more secure system on a couple of mail lists 
> and
> a secure news server. One mail list was provided by me, the other by 
> Dennis.

Actually everyone knew why he decided to try and screw up this group.  He 
said it multiple times.  He wanted everyone to go to Dennis's group, he even 
refered to it as his group.

>> bit.listserv.coco is still alive and everyone is welcome to join in and
> make
>> it stronger.  That is what I like about Usenet, it is inclusive.
>
> So far the porn flood has not resumed. But activity may attract it.

No, the porn came via the mail gateway.  Now it gets the same SPAM activity 
as most other Usenet groups, maybe one every other week or so.

Even with every SPAM blocker I have set up I get more SPAM in my personal 
email.

>> I am not the one trying to force anyone to leave, by your own words you
> have
>> decided to take that job on yourself.
>
> This is a lie. Show me any time or place where I have done or said 
> anything
> of the sort. All I offered was a place for people to go.

You don't offer people a place to go, you stand at the door and tell them to 
leave.  You tell them they must go where you want them to go.

>> You apparently are just someone trying to burn down this group again.
>
> Another lie.
>
>> It's here please don't try and destroy it, we have had enough from people
>> like you trying to destroy it.
>
> Another lie.
>
>> As far as I am concerned if anyone wants to come they are welcome, if 
>> they
>> want to leave that's also their choice.  People like you are trying to
> stop
>> people from coming and you should be ashamed of yourself.
>
> Another lie.

Your actions say it all.

>> If you have anything constructive to add to this community I would be
> happy
>> to have you add it here, if all you want to do is to take from the
> community
>> I for one do not appreciate it.
>
> It's not your choice. You don't own this, or any other group.
>
>> If they are here and looking for coco support they are not lost.
>
> Not if they find the rest of us. My Coco list 'ColorComputer' now has 383
> members. I believe Dennis's list is similar. Since Bitnet is apparently
> toast now, I suspect this list will not approach that number of active
> members.
>
> N

Building a group by being abusive in another should make you feel great.

Face the truth whether you like it or not this group is rebuilding.

It is not my group it is not your group.  It is an open group this is the 
only open group.

No one can stop you from being abusive here.  If shame won't stop you and 
your type, just to make it clear I mean the type that will do anything to 
destroy what you can't control, then there is nothing more than showing how 
shameful you are that I can do.

It was someone just like you that decided that the easiest way to get people 
to leave this group was to sign-up the gateway to porn sites.


Randy