🚀 go-pugleaf

"Brian {Hamilton Kelly}" <bhk@dsl.co.uk> wrote in message
news:20040621.2003.56735snz@dsl.co.uk...
> On Monday, in article
>      <qTuBc.1381$DN3.557@bignews2.bellsouth.net> randy@nospam.com
>      "Randy McLaughlin" wrote:
>
> > Now here you come from the group that has done so much destruction to
this
> > group and again the post is you need to leave this group.
> >
> > Go away, if you don't like this group then don't read the posts.  If you
do
> > read the posts stop SPAMMING the group with your un-wanted posts.
> >
> >
> > If you continue I will report you to your ISP.
>
> Well said; however, to which of these groups were you referring:
>     bit.listserv.coco,
>     comp.sys.tandy,
>     comp.sys.m6809
> given that the original post (and your follow-up) were cross-posted to
> all three?
>
> -- 
>    fix (vb.): 1. to paper over, obscure, hide from public view; 2. to
>    work around, in a way that produces unintended consequences that are
>    worse than the original problem.  Usage: "Windows ME fixes many of the
>    shortcomings of Windows 98 SE".

Sorry the original SAPMMER was spamming multiple groups.  The truth is my
message applies to all of the groups he is spamming.  He wants people to
leave their groups and join his.  He mentions bit.listserv.coco specifically
but obviously he wants people from other groups to join his also.

He points out problems in bit.listserv.coco had in the past caused by
someone claiming to be part of his group as a reason to join his group.  It
is insane to believe that anyone would run from the SPAM created by someone
in his group would then join his group.  Sadly though many did.


Randy