🚀 go-pugleaf

"Stan Blazejewski" <stanblaz@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:9f1jd0tdb0l7j8luurs668f2k8fri0c2bh@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:03:06 +0100 (BST), bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian
> {Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:
>
> >On Monday, in article
> >     <qTuBc.1381$DN3.557@bignews2.bellsouth.net> randy@nospam.com
> >     "Randy McLaughlin" wrote:
> >
> >> Now here you come from the group that has done so much destruction to
this
> >> group and again the post is you need to leave this group.
> >>
> >> Go away, if you don't like this group then don't read the posts.  If
you do
> >> read the posts stop SPAMMING the group with your un-wanted posts.
> >>
> >>
> >> If you continue I will report you to your ISP.
> >
> >Well said; however, to which of these groups were you referring:
> >    bit.listserv.coco,
> >    comp.sys.tandy,
> >    comp.sys.m6809
> >given that the original post (and your follow-up) were cross-posted to
> >all three?
>
> Life is too short to get all worked up about one Email a month (that's
> less that a tenth of a percent of my total spam!)
>
> Using the Texaco and Exxon analogy, I'm sure they would be happy to
> point out where other of their own stations are located.  The Email
> merely points out that there are other CoCo  'stations' around.  It's
> up to the individual whether to go there or not.
>
> Would you get hot under the collar if a station attendant gave you
> directions to another of the same station that you didn't like it's
> location?
>
> Personally I am subscribed to any/all things CoCo & they are all
> interesting in their own way.
>
>
> --
>
> Australia isn't "down under", it's "off to one side"!
>
> stanblaz@netspace.net.au
> www.stanblaz.customer.netspace.net.au
> www.cobracat.com (home of the Australian Cobra Catamaran)

If someone asks for other groups responding would be polite.  That is not
the case here, it is not polite to ask others to leave a group.

More than that the only trouble that bit.listserv.coco was caused by someone
from his group that signed up the listserver with his favorite pornography
sites (luckily the listserver is no longer connected).  That anonymous
poster also used an anonymizer that specialized in covering the tracks of
illegal pornographers.

Guess who also posts using a commercial usenet provider that specializes in
pornography even though his Vermont ISP provides free usenet access.

Randy