(no subject given)

Article View: bit.listserv.coco

Article #43560

#43560

From: RICKULAND
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1993 07:24

11 lines
1462 bytes

     I just saw a blurb for OS9 v3.0 in "Electronic Design".
The blurbwriter obviously didn't know OS9, for example she
considers disk drivers, etc part of the kernal. So it had to be
fairly tightly quoted from whatever press release the author got,
and follows the same pattern as other OS9 info I've seen.
     Perhaps MWare should rethink thier press releases.The
impression is OS9 is only useful for very large, very involved,
closely timed embedded aps. It sounds like a mammoth hunk of ROM
eating, RAM quaffing OpSys and a passing mention of Atomic OS9
(20% smaller!) makes it sound even bigger!
     Of course, there is no mention of desktopability

Technical Details

Message-ID: <01H5N252A6MQ90O82T@delphi.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DELPHI.COM!RICKULAND

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 110568,c97b78e939c2cc51,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid110568,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-11-23 05:18:34 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DELPHI.COM!RICKULAND
Subject: (no subject given)
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.coco
Return-Path: <@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU:COCO@PUCC.BITNET>
X-VMS-To: INTERNET"coco@pucc.princeton.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Message-ID: <01H5N252A6MQ90O82T@delphi.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1993 03:24:10 -0400
Reply-To: RICKULAND@DELPHI.COM
Sender: COCO - Tandy Color Computer List <COCO@PUCC.BITNET>
From: RICKULAND@DELPHI.COM
Lines: 10