Article View: bit.listserv.confocal
Article #148Re: Nailpolish. was: Losing GFP Signal
From: Anda Cornea
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 00:00
79 lines
3482 bytes
3482 bytes
Dear Steffen, I use clear Wet 'n Wild. It is toluene/formaldehyde free, I wonder whether this is what makes a difference. Clonetech recommends rubber cement or agarose for sealing, but we found no reason to not use nailpolish, our standard sealant. Anda Cornea, Ph.D. Oregon Regional Primate Research Center 505 NW 185th Avenue Beaverton, OR 97006 ph: (503) 690-5293 fax:(503) 690-5384 >>> Jacques Paysan <paysan@UNI-HOHENHEIM.DE> 03/10 2:42 PM >>> Dear Steffen I found some melted parafin most useful to replace nail polish (I picked this up from a newsgroup discussion some time ago). Simply apply with the edge of a heated slide that you dip into a block of parafin. With a little practice this works very easily. No effect on GFP and other fluorescent dyes at all. Jacques ----- Original Message ----- Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 8:28 PM Subject: Nailpolish. was: Losing GFP Signal > Anda, > > wheras I never had problems with overnight fixation of cells in 1.6 % > formaldehyde, I did have problems with the nailpolish: I have tried several > ones and they all killed the GFP before the slide was even on the scope. I have > heard rumors of nailpolish that does not harm GFP, but was never able to hunt > one down, therefore PLEASE: > Could you let us know the exact brand name, product number or whatever is > usefull to find the nailpolish you are using? > > Thanks! Steffen > > --- Anda Cornea <corneaan@OHSU.EDU> schrieb: > > > > >>> "Goodhouse, Joseph" Long > > For fixation employ low percentage paraformaldehyde for the shortest periods > > of fixation as possible( 5- 10 minutes for cells). Samples should be > > mounted in glycerol based mounting medium. I have found 90% buffered > > glycerol to be best. Avoid using nail polish as sealant of coverslips. In > > a short time this will wipe out your GFP signal. > > > > We routinely use 4%paraformaldehyde, 30minutes fixation, for cells expressing > > a GFP-membrane receptor chimera and seal slides with nailpolish. We see no > > loss of intensity when compared with live cells expressing the same > > construct, not even after a few months storage. > > > > ===== > Dr. Steffen Dietzel > Dept. of Cell and Structural Biology > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > 601 S. Goodwin Ave. > Urbana, IL 61801 > Phone: +1/217/333-8372 Fax: +1/217/244-1648 > e-mail: dietzels@yahoo.de Web: http://www.life.uiuc.edu/belmont/dietzel > __________________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de > Yahoo! Auktionen - gleich ausprobieren - http://auktionen.yahoo.de
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<s8c90ac1.085@gwsmtp.ohsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114d69,43acc16e0e527367 X-Google-Attributes: gid114d69,public From: Anda Cornea <corneaan@OHSU.EDU> Subject: Re: Nailpolish. was: Losing GFP Signal Date: 2000/03/10 Message-ID: <s8c90ac1.085@gwsmtp.ohsu.edu> X-Deja-AN: 595875025 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: 10 Mar 2000 17:58:12 -0500, 127.0.0.1 X-Gateway-From: add_from_switch_to_drobot Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <CONFOCAL@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> Content-Disposition: inline X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by flint.sentex.net id RAA08300 Newsgroups: bit.listserv.confocal